Markus

My feedback

  1. 74 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    43 comments  ·  Azure Monitor » SMS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have enabled SMS support for the following country codes. We’re still working on additional voice support.

    • Australia
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • Chile
    • China
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Ireland
    • Israel
    • Italy
    • Japan
    • Luxembourg
    • Netherlands
    • New Zealand
    • Norway
    • Portugal
    • Puerto Rico
    • Romania
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • Switzerland
    • South Africa
    • South Korea
    • Spain
    • Taiwan
    • United Kingdom
    • United States of America

    SMS coming soon for
    • Jordan
    • Malaysia
    • Mexico
    • United Arab Emirates

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Markus commented  · 

    +49 Germany

    Markus supported this idea  · 
  2. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Sorry folks, but we are not able to repro this issue (either using SSMS 17.9.1 or SSMS 18 Preview 7).

    Since multiple people out there are reporting this issue, it is obvious that we are missing something that is specific to your environment or configuration.

    Could you help us out and try to describe a little better your subscription/environment/account/permissions?

    For example, does the following mainstream scenario works for you all:
    1) Connect to Azure Portal
    2) Create SQL server+database
    3) Go to SSMS and connect to
    4) Add firewall rule

    If it does, then can you identify what is different between the case where it works and the case where it does not?

    Thanks,
    -Matteo

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Markus commented  · 

    I still have the issue with v18

  3. 106 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Storage » Storage Emulator  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. Providing this functionality is on our backlog but there is no ETA we can share at this time. We have logged this request in the GitHub repository for the new open source storage emulator, Azurite. Please continue the discussion there: https://github.com/Azure/Azurite/issues/40. We will provide updates when they become available on this ask as well as in the GitHub repository. For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    Markus supported this idea  · 
  4. 998 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    50 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Markus supported this idea  · 
  5. 265 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    28 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The work to start showing creation metadata for new resources and modification metadata for existing resources is currently ongoing, but work is required by each resource provider. As a result, we will be pushing resource types out steadily over the next year or so based on each team’s availability. If you have certain resource types that you wish to be prioritized, please create requests on the feedback pages for those services.

    Markus supported this idea  · 
  6. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Media Services » Azure Media Player  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Markus supported this idea  · 
  7. 38 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Markus supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,353 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  39 comments  ·  Azure Search » Client SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Markus supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,141 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Markus supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base