RichCheneyAzure

My feedback

  1. 162 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RichCheneyAzure commented  · 

    Fantastic news! I put together a little template to check that it will work once everything is updated:

    ```bash
    az group deployment validate --resource-group zero --template-uri https://raw.githubusercontent.com/richeney/azure-blueprints/master/modules/zero.json
    ```

    Currently fails to validate with:

    "message": "Deployment template validation failed: 'The template 'copy' definition at line '57' and column '21' has an invalid copy count. The copy count must be a positive integer value and cannot exceed '800'. Please see https://aka.ms/arm-copy for usage details.'."

    RichCheneyAzure commented  · 

    @Klaas, was the before or after the Jan 11th date when the governance team posted above? It would be incredibly disappointing if this elegant solution wasn't implemented.

    I wrote a workaround for something more complicated than the dataDisks examples (a nested subnets array in https://github.com/richeney/azure-blueprints/blob/master/modules/vnet.json , that uses variables('dummyArray') if there are no subnets to create), and a few months later I struggle to understand the syntax. These ugly workarounds need to go!

    RichCheneyAzure commented  · 

    If count evaluates to zero then it should generate the same as "[json('null')]". That would make life so much simpler.

    RichCheneyAzure supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.

    RichCheneyAzure shared this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.

    RichCheneyAzure shared this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RichCheneyAzure shared this idea  · 
  5. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Governance » Azure Blueprints  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RichCheneyAzure shared this idea  · 
  6. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Governance » Azure Policy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RichCheneyAzure supported this idea  · 
  7. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Governance » Azure Blueprints  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RichCheneyAzure shared this idea  · 
  8. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Governance » Azure Blueprints  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RichCheneyAzure commented  · 

    Especially key as some of the policy initiatives require providers such as Microsoft.GuestConfiguration to be registered. To include this in the policy definition makes sense.

    RichCheneyAzure supported this idea  · 
  9. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Governance » Azure Blueprints  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RichCheneyAzure commented  · 

    Well, JSON file for import and export. Much like dashboards.

  10. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RichCheneyAzure shared this idea  · 
  11. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Cloud Shell » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RichCheneyAzure shared this idea  · 
  12. 33 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RichCheneyAzure supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base