Marek Grabarz
My feedback
-
350 votes
We have a sample for this use case here: https://github.com/azure-ad-b2c/samples/tree/master/policies/invite
Let us know what you think and if this fits your use case.
Marek Grabarz
supported this idea
·
-
170 votes
This is not planned for the next 6 months, but is on the roadmap.
/Parakh
Marek Grabarz
supported this idea
·
-
144 votes
-
24 votesMarek Grabarz
supported this idea
·
-
2,255 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of static website hosting for Azure Storage to enable this scenario. Check out the blog post here for more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-storage-static-web-hosting-public-preview. The feature set includes support for default documents and custom error documents for HTTP status code 404.
For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.
Marek Grabarz
supported this idea
·
-
105 votes
We definitely want to make this happen! Thank you for your feedback.
Marek Grabarz
supported this idea
·
-
303 votes
We have released the public preview for this feature! Learn more about how to use it here: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/active-directory-b2c/active-directory-b2c-setup-oidc-azure-active-directory
/Sam
Marek Grabarz
supported this idea
·
Marek Grabarz
commented
It would be also great if we could stack B2Cs, ability to add not only AAD provider to B2C but another B2C.
This might help to create B2Cs for company subsidiaries, and some sort of shared services for all of them. -
2,846 votes
Quick update,
We have been considering all of the risks and investigating the steps required to ensure we implement this feature with high positive impact and low to no negative impact.
After this investigation we have decided we will enable Pay-As-You-Go customers the option to configure a spending limit on a Pay-As-You-Go subscription, with appropriate safeguards and measures to prevent both service abuse and production service failure.
We have not yet finished determining the details of what this feature will look like, nor do we have a timeline for release, but we have heard your voices and have added this feature to our backlog.
Thanks for your continued feedback,
-Adam (Azure Billing Team)
Marek Grabarz
supported this idea
·
-
990 votes
Hey Folks,
We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.
We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.
Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.
Thanks,
Azure Portal TeamMarek Grabarz
supported this idea
·
-
1,112 votes
Hey Folks,
We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.
We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.
Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.
Thanks,
Azure Portal TeamMarek Grabarz
supported this idea
·
You can easily configure IP restrictions placing APIM in VNET in Internal mode. Then you can route traffic through NSG controlled VIP, applicances, Intranet or WAF.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/api-management/api-management-using-with-internal-vnet