Don Petry
My feedback
-
30 votesDon Petry
shared this idea
·
-
33 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesunder review · 0 comments · Networking » Application Gateway · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Don Petry
supported this idea
·
-
51 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
After much feedback, we have moved this into our planning. We dont have a concrete date at this point, but we hope to have repo permissions, through tokens, in the fall of ’18
Don Petry
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesDon Petry
shared this idea
·
-
123 votes
We are working on making Active Directory integration available with HDInsight. We’ll provide further updates on this thread as we get closer to general availability.
Adnan Ijaz
Program Manager
Microsoft Azure HDInsightDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
1,083 votes
[Update] Thanks for your continued feedback on this capability! Rest assured that we are tracking this request closely along with several other platform capabilities our customers have requested. In the meanwhile, you can leverage cluster scaling capability to adjust HDInsight cluster size according to your varying compute needs. Azure Data Factory is another option you can explore for scheduling jobs with automatic creation and deletion of clusters: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/data-factory-data-transformation-activities/
Adnan Ijaz
Program Manager
Microsoft Azure HDInsightDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
2,998 votes
Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.
We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!
Thanks,
Will Gries
Program Manager, Azure FilesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
Don Petry
shared this idea
·
-
9 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
Don Petry
shared this idea
·
-
84 votes
This is now in our planning.
Don Petry
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesDon Petry
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesDon Petry
commented
We are also deploying multi-VNet based solutions across multiple subscriptions. For AAD-DS to be a viable solution it must natively support the ability to participate in multiple VNet's.
Don Petry
supported this idea
·
-
124 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
Transitive network flow between peered vnets is on our roadmap but we have no dates to share at this time.
Don Petry
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesDon Petry
commented
The use of private IP also improves the connectivity and routing options when using a complex network topology that involves non-Azure resources.
Don Petry
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesDon Petry
commented
Allowing SQL DB to use a VNET based IP address would significantly improve the manageability, security and accessibility in a high security corporate environment.
Don Petry
supported this idea
·
-
193 votes
Thank you for the feedback on this issue. We’re still considering it but don’t have a specific ETA so updating the status. It’s helpful to understand your scenarios around this and other features so please feel to keep commenting with how you would use this.
-Elisabeth
Don Petry
commented
The old portal allowed the addition of an account "from another Azure AD tenant which I manage". These accounts are set to "member" but show the "#EXT#" UPN for external user.
It does not appear possible to add external accounts as "member" in the new portal.
Looking for a clear definition between Guest and (#EXT#) Member to understand if/when/where this will be an issue.
This is similar to or would be addressed by:
https://feedback.azure.com/forums/169401-azure-active-directory/suggestions/33618100-provide-aad-ds-support-for-geo-dispersed-deploymen