Don Petry
My feedback
-
3 votesDon Petry
shared this idea
·
-
35 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
35 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesDon Petry
shared this idea
·
-
6 votesDon Petry
shared this idea
·
-
9 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
81 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
145 votesunder review · 13 comments · Azure Active Directory » Developer Experiences · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Don Petry
supported this idea
·
-
122 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Don Petry
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesDon Petry
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesDon Petry
shared this idea
·
-
131 votes
We are working on making Active Directory integration available with HDInsight. We’ll provide further updates on this thread as we get closer to general availability.
Adnan Ijaz
Program Manager
Microsoft Azure HDInsightDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
1,223 votes
[Update] Thanks for your continued feedback on this capability! Rest assured that we are tracking this request closely along with several other platform capabilities our customers have requested. In the meanwhile, you can leverage cluster scaling capability to adjust HDInsight cluster size according to your varying compute needs. Azure Data Factory is another option you can explore for scheduling jobs with automatic creation and deletion of clusters: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/data-factory-data-transformation-activities/
Adnan Ijaz
Program Manager
Microsoft Azure HDInsightDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
5,640 votes
Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.
We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!
Thanks,
Will Gries
Program Manager, Azure FilesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
Don Petry
shared this idea
·
-
40 votesDon Petry
shared this idea
·
-
7 votesDon Petry
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Don Petry
commented
This is similar to or would be addressed by:
https://feedback.azure.com/forums/169401-azure-active-directory/suggestions/33618100-provide-aad-ds-support-for-geo-dispersed-deploymen -
186 votes
Transitive network flow between peered vnets is on our roadmap but we have no dates to share at this time.
Don Petry
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Don Petry
commented
Allowing SQL DB to use a VNET based IP address would significantly improve the manageability, security and accessibility in a high security corporate environment.
Don Petry
supported this idea
·
-
302 votes
Updating the status to indicate that this is a valid suggestion and in our backlog for the future. Please keep the comments/votes coming, knowing more about how you intend to use this helps us prioritize and design better features.
/Elisabeth
An error occurred while saving the comment Don Petry
commented
The old portal allowed the addition of an account "from another Azure AD tenant which I manage". These accounts are set to "member" but show the "#EXT#" UPN for external user.
It does not appear possible to add external accounts as "member" in the new portal.
Looking for a clear definition between Guest and (#EXT#) Member to understand if/when/where this will be an issue.
This limitation is documented here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/connectors/connectors-create-api-azureblobstorage#access-storage-accounts-behind-firewalls
We'd like to see this limitation removed. Placing Storage Accounts in a different region creates issues with performance, manageability, resilience, and data sovereignty.