Peter Jones

My feedback

  1. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Jones commented  · 

    I think it would be good to be able to replicate to a lower tier, we have an application that requires a high read performance but has very low write performance, generally 95/5 read/write, with 500DTU read perf requirements. But only 10 DTU writes.

    Currently to add replication we'd be paying 30x the amount that our performance requirements drive. Even if we had to have a minimum of 50DTU we'd still be saving a huge amount but our data would be so much more secure.

    Alternatively we'd be willing to replicate to PRS from P as that would be great for the secondary location which doesn't need the same high resiliancy as it is already a secondary.

  2. 441 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Jones supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,255 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    36 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Jones supported this idea  · 
  4. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Jones supported this idea  · 
  5. 495 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    28 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Jones supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base