Mike

My feedback

  1. 95 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    triaged  ·  6 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,107 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Mike supported this idea  · 
  3. 254 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  4. 60 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  5. 86 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  9 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  6. 158 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  13 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  7. 248 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  7 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,515 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    156 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  9. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  10. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  11. 4,466 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    178 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.

    We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Mike supported this idea  · 
  12. 1,791 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    105 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike commented  · 

    Microsoft really needs to give higher priority to customer desires to 'scale down' scenarios in Azure like this. It's not the most obvious feature to pursue at first from Microsoft's perspective because it seems they don't immediately benefit financially from scale down scenarios, however, it is possible that 1) Adoption rates could be higher if these options were available. For example, I purposely do not use Azure VPN because I can't scale down when I don't need it and I'm not willing to write my own scripting for it. 2) The improved efficiency/usage of the Azure network adds more value out of every CPU cycle. 3) No company survives the long term by charging for something that adds NO value. In order to survive the long-term, you have to constantly be pushing the value proposition to customers and NOT charging them for something they're not using. 4) The wastefulness of unused resources at cloud scale is destructive 5) The customer satisfaction of getting good value out of the product re-wins them over every day.

    Mike supported this idea  · 
  13. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike shared this idea  · 
  14. 43 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Web Apps » Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi everyone, we have some long-term plans to improve the restart speed and experience.

    For this scenario we suggest creating a new slot, applying your changes there, validating they work, and swapping your changes. This pattern will avoid downtime on your production site.

    Mike supported this idea  · 
  15. 267 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Web Apps » Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  16. 975 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  17. 257 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  18. 496 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  19. 114 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike commented  · 

    15 votes in only 6 weeks, that's not bad. Any updates on this? I guess this is harder than it seems?

    Mike commented  · 

    Any updates on this? This continues to be a pain point for me.

    Mike commented  · 

    Thanks for the updates Oded and Ruslan. As a workaround for now, does anyone know if I set Always On=false and use something like uptime robot to ping the site is that sufficient to keep it always on? I read somewhere that it won't work for free accounts, but obviously in this case i'm thinking about using it as a workaround on standard or premium tier.

    Mike shared this idea  · 
  20. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base