Joel

My feedback

  1. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2B  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel commented  · 

    This is very much a needed feature! Please implement this feature!

    Joel supported this idea  · 
  2. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel commented  · 

    Right...any option beyond Round Robin would be appreciated! Least connections...CPU Usage...would love any other option!

  3. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel commented  · 

    PID scaling...love it!

  4. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel supported this idea  · 
  5. 434 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel commented  · 

    Any updates on this? It has been 18 months since the last update. This really, really needs to happen.

    Joel supported this idea  · 
  6. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Joel supported this idea  · 
  7. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel commented  · 
  8. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel supported this idea  · 
  9. 59 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hi,
    Assigning cloud groups to built-in roles is in public preview starting today. Here’s the published documentation -

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/users-groups-roles/roles-groups-concept

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/privileged-identity-management/groups-features

    We will get started on on-prem groups shortly. Stay tuned!

    Regards,
    Abhijeet Kumar Sinha
    Azure Active Directory Team

    Joel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel commented  · 

    Any update on this? This is super important!

  10. 111 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  API Management » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel supported this idea  · 
  11. 207 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    42 comments  ·  Azure Management Groups » New Feature Request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel commented  · 

    It appears you can create custom roles with an assignable scope at the management group level, however, the management group IAM GUI does not display these scopes. They do inherit down to all sub-level items (Subscriptions,, Resource Groups, and Resources) and show properly in the GUI at those levels. Is this working or not working yet? Partially working?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel commented  · 

    Any updates?

    Joel supported this idea  · 
  12. 67 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel commented  · 

    It appears you can create custom roles with an assignable scope at the management group level, however, the management group IAM GUI does not display these scopes. They do inherit down to all sub-level items (Subscriptions,, Resource Groups, and Resources) and show properly in the GUI at those levels.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel commented  · 

    Is it not time to get an update on this feature request?

    Joel supported this idea  · 
  13. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Joel supported this idea  · 
  14. 30 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel supported this idea  · 
  15. 316 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  16 comments  ·  Data Catalog » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel supported this idea  · 
  16. 1,999 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    414 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » SaaS Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re currently evaluating an option that will provide the functionality offered by nested groups, but removes the complexity nested groups adds. We appreciate your patience on this ask and want to ensure we deliver a solution that benefits all of our customers. Below are use cases that we’d like for you to stack rank, with #1 being priority for you. We thank you for the continued comments and feedback.

    Use case A: nested group in a cloud security group inherits apps assignment
    Use case B: nested group in a cloud security group inherits license assignment
    Use case C: nesting groups under Office 365 groups

    Joel supported this idea  · 
  17. 403 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel supported this idea  · 
  18. 113 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  14 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel supported this idea  · 
  19. 116 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  SQL Managed Instance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi all and thank you for your feedback. While this will not directly address backup and restore from MI to back on-premises SQL (this is also being considered and some updates might follow), we are considering a replication technology which might help support this scenario. We are exploring product improvement opportunities in the area of hybrid link using distributed availability groups (AG) replication technology between SQL Server and MI. This will enable near real time data replication between SQL Server and MI. We are also considering failover scenarios both ways. If this might interest you, we invite you to provide your feedback to the engineering team through this online survey: https://aka.ms/mipg-chimera-survey. Thank you.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel commented  · 

    While it is true that the DB Engine of SMI may be changing frequently...the Internal Database Version number should not be changing frequently. It would be extremely helpful if the Internal Database Version number used in SMI was coordinated with the latest Internal Database Version number used on the latest version of SQL Server On-Premise (or IaaS). This of tremendous value for folks that want to push forward into hybrid cloud, but are fearful of an inability to return back fully in tack. BACPAC and Replication are not solutions, they are half-baked work arounds. If they were solutions then there would be no need for backup to exist in SQL Server at all.

    Joel supported this idea  · 
  20. 64 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Azure Reservations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base