Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

MC

My feedback

  1. 21 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MC supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MC commented  · 

    This is a real big blocking issue to use this feature. Why is this not possible?
    I understand that the databases are physically setup on different machines but the logical server brings them together (virtually).

  2. 109 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Purview » Lineage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MC commented  · 

    This metadata is already available in SQL Server (select * from sys.sql_dependencies)
    It should not be to hard to have first version showing dependencies like this:

    InputTable1\___(name stored proc)___TargetTable
    InputTable2/

    MC supported this idea  · 
  3. 111 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure Purview  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MC supported this idea  · 
  4. 209 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    23 comments  ·  Azure Purview » Scan and Scan Rule Sets  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MC supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,743 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  67 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MC supported this idea  · 
  6. 568 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  14 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MC supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,991 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    91 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Great news – static IP range for Azure Integration Runtime is now available in all ADF regions! You can whitelist specific IP ranges for ADF as part of firewall rules. The IPs are documented here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/azure-integration-runtime-ip-addresses#azure-integration-runtime-ip-addresses-specific-regions. Static IP ranges for gov cloud and China cloud will be published soon!

    Please refer to this blog post on how you can use various mechanisms including trusted Azure service and static IP to secure data access through ADF:
    https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-data-factory/azure-data-factory-now-supports-static-ip-address-ranges/ba-p/1117508

    Service tag support will be made available in next few weeks. Please stay tuned!

    If your network security requirement calls for ADF support for VNet and cannot be met using Trusted Azure service (released in Oct 2019), static IP range (released in Jan 2020), or service tag (upcoming), please vote for VNet feature here: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/270578-data-factory/suggestions/37105363-data-factory-should-be-able-to-use-vnet-without-re

    MC supported this idea  · 
  8. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MC supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MC commented  · 

    SQL Server Management Studio 15.0.18118.0
    Microsoft Analysis Services Client Tools 15.0.1300.131
    Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) 10.0.17134.1
    Microsoft MSXML 3.0 6.0
    Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.11.17134.0
    Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0.30319.42000
    Operating System 6.3.17134

    Still the same....

  9. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MC shared this idea  · 
  10. 1,536 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    58 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MC supported this idea  · 
  11. 41 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    18 comments  ·  Azure Synapse Analytics » SQL/Loading  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MC commented  · 

    Here as well. Still does not work:
    "Msg 102048, Level 16, State 1, Line 147
    Columns with large object types are not supported in external tables."

  12. 291 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  14 comments  ·  Azure Synapse Analytics » SQL/Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MC supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MC commented  · 

    This would take away a lot of headache

Feedback and Knowledge Base