Veli-Jussi Raitila

My feedback

  1. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Veli-Jussi Raitila shared this idea  · 
  2. 2,229 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    54 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Veli-Jussi Raitila commented  · 

    The DataOps story using Microsoft tooling is woefully inadequate without this. One should really be able to work on all the interrelated components within a data platform with unified tooling, commit into version control and deploy the changes into the appropriate environments e.g. with Azure DevOps. Having ADF support in Visual Studio is one piece of the puzzle and it seems that the teams developing various Azure services are not thinking about this holistically.

    Now that the SSDT support for Azure SQL DW database projects is (finally) in preview, and ADF is the preferred Microsoft-provided tool for orchestrating data transformations, it should be fairly obvious that these things are closely related.

    Sad that this is the top-voted feedback item for Data Factory and not even a comment from the team in 2 years...

    Veli-Jussi Raitila supported this idea  · 
  3. 60 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Veli-Jussi Raitila supported this idea  · 
  4. 101 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Veli-Jussi Raitila supported this idea  · 
  5. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Database for PostgreSQL » Extension  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Veli-Jussi Raitila supported this idea  · 
  6. 377 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  9 comments  ·  API Management » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Veli-Jussi Raitila supported this idea  · 
  7. 39 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Veli-Jussi Raitila supported this idea  · 
  8. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  API Management » Policies  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Veli-Jussi Raitila shared this idea  · 
  9. 288 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  13 comments  ·  API Management » Pricing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Veli-Jussi Raitila supported this idea  · 
  10. 93 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Veli-Jussi Raitila supported this idea  · 
  11. 80 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  API Management » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Veli-Jussi Raitila commented  · 

    Discussion here https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/api-management/api-management-howto-protect-backend-with-aad indicates that many are struggling with same exact issue. And surprisingly no response.

    People are just using different terminology, such as: "headless integrations", "service-to-service calls", "API-to-API scenarios"... But it's the same problem.

    Veli-Jussi Raitila commented  · 

    I'm curious on how people have gone about this. It seems pretty obvious that Azure API Management in its current state does not exactly support exposing APIs which are meant to be consumed by daemon / server applications directly.

    I'm talking about scenarios where the end-user is not involved and a simple two-legged Client Credentials Grant would suffice.

    You can cobble something together, but the end result is not pretty. I think this is a major shortcoming.

    Veli-Jussi Raitila supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base