Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 845 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  315 comments  ·  SQL Server  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,516 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  169 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 222 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  SQL Data Sync  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Shirley Wang responded

    We are more focused around data synchronization than schema synchronization at the moment. We may revisit the priority of this in the future.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base