Kurt Roggen [BE]

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Lab Services » DevTest Labs - Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kurt Roggen [BE] shared this idea  · 
  2. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » Conditional Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  3. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Identity Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  4. 219 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  5. 82 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  6. 579 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    84 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Azure AD Connect  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    started  ·  Azure AD Team responded

    Hi everyone,
    Thanks for your interest on this feature. This capability is still in the pipeline. The initial estimate was obviously off and we are looking at a new timeline. We are aware of the benefit of having this rollover made automatic and the interest you have on the feature, and that’s how we are looking at it while prioritizing it against other capabilities requests.
    Thanks for your patience!

    Jairo Cadena
    Principal Program Manager
    Microsoft Identity

    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  7. 744 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  8. 833 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  9. 937 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    83 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback, we’re currently reviewing this capability to see how we can support RADIUS auth on NPS specifically, for AAD Joined Windows 10 devices to authenticate to WiFi access points

    If there are scenarios beyond the above, please provide the details in the comments


    Ravi

    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  10. 1,300 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We have released the Authentication administrator and Privileged authentication administrator roles that can manage the authentication methods of the user. If you are using Azure AD Premium, consider enforcing MFA on the user using Conditional Access. We are continuing to work on other roles that will let you manage other MFA settings.

    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  11. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Storage » Managed Disk Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kurt Roggen [BE] shared this idea  · 
  13. 338 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback! We working to provide this functionality through the Azure Backup offering. They are currently testing this functionality in a private preview, and are going to be entering a public preview soon. I will update this feedback item as soon as this is released.

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kurt Roggen [BE] commented  · 
  14. 64 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback! Azure File Sync automatically takes share snapshots and file snapshots for internal use. We also have our own logic about when to remove these snapshots. We’re interested to know what you think about this – please vote for this item and comment below if you think we need better/different controls/reporting for this.

    If what you actually want is the ability to do snapshots and have retention policies for snapshots for the purpose of Backup, please vote on this item: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/217298-storage/suggestions/31827694-schedule-snapshots-of-azure-file-shares

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Kurt Roggen [BE] shared this idea  · 
  15. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  16. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  ruturajd responded

    We are working to understand the requirements of this feature and deliver it. If you have any scenarios or examples that might help us take a decision kindly give a detailed comment below.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kurt Roggen [BE] commented  · 

    In an ASR Recovery Plan, groups are allowed to allow (for example) multi tier apps to come up in an ordered fashion (which is absoluty mandatory). However, you refer to these groups as "group 1", "group 2", "group 3".

    I would like to add/see additional text added per group that allows the DR operator to better understand which group is being processed.
    For example: Database Tier instead of Group 1, Web Tier, but it could be whatever...

    The operator executing the DR process typcially has no idea what the workloads are about. But adding a (minor) change to allow some descriptive text for the groups is not a big ask, i believe.

    The Recovery plans still need some additional work. Since you dont provide a lot of flexibility within a VM group like startup delays, VM startup order, etc... some VMs must be move to dedicated VM groups (holding only 1 VM). This is when a group name/description becomes crucial. I known that manual script are the answer to everything, but you should add some extra basic operations.

    It also makes the DR process more readable.

    Hope this helps.

    Kurt Roggen [BE] shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base