Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    The AAD B2C admin should be able to enable MFA on a given user or group, just like it is possible in AAD or O365. Currently, it is coupled to the Flow for all apps or users using a given flow.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  3. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure IoT Edge » Deploying modules  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Thanks for the 20, we'll need more :-) The simplest designs separate coupling and concerns. At best, we would have simple modules (containers) in the IoT-Edge for each device type that is installed in a factory floor or hospital region. This can be well over 20 device types (classes or categories of different device types) of course.

    If we take this separation-of-concerns thought further and say that we'd like to have even simpler code and better separation of concerns, then each edge module could handle and individual instance of a device. Then, our code would not even have to do multiplexing and multi-device-instance (of a device type/class) management. This instance-variant would be closer to functions as a service though, which is already available on the Edge if I am correct -- as long as it is production-ready...

  4. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This is a must-do for the IoT-Hub and IoT-Edge. Announce it now, or lose serious ground. Sincerly.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 98 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 291 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Gremlin API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    A GraphQl service like graphcool and https://cloudacademy.com/blog/aws-appsync-graphql-as-a-service/ as an Azure AppService would be preferable ... I think there is a feedback.azure.com suggestion regarding this already.

  8. 49 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure IoT Edge » Installing IoT Edge runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 368 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    61 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    As long as it is brandable and customizable (like Auth0's lock.js) then this is fine.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage » Storage Explorer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  12. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure portal » Dashboards + tiles  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base