Bill Trinh

My feedback

  1. 289 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Bill Trinh supported this idea  · 
  2. 449 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  13 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bill Trinh supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,249 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    unplanned  ·  29 comments  ·  Azure Backup » IaaS VM  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bill Trinh supported this idea  · 
  4. 158 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Just to confirm the request, this is around having the complete SMA experience for tenants, correct? Should tenants be allowed to author their own runbooks? Or are you looking to have the admin provide runbook content for the tenants so that they can run and schedule approved runbooks?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Trinh commented  · 

    +1. Not sure if there is a need to allow tenants to author runbooks but for admins to offer predefined runbooks as a service for tenants to use is important. Consider the use case where tenants who have no VMM or Azure knowledge or access, and simply want to have the capability to quickly stand up a few VMs thru the UI, there isn't a way to do it today.

Feedback and Knowledge Base