Greg Lloyd

My feedback

  1. 4,030 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    163 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.

    We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Greg Lloyd commented  · 

    Additionally support with Azure AD and/or AAD B2C that permissions can be scaled by user account.

    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  2. 89 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd commented  · 

    Has there been any update on this? We tried to use the following the 'oms-azure-storage-analytics-solution' solution which is in GitHub, link at bottom, however this did not work. Any update would be greatly appreciated.

    https://github.com/Azure/azure-quickstart-templates/tree/master/oms-azure-storage-analytics-solution

  3. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  4. 68 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  5. 212 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Greg Lloyd commented  · 

    Totally concur, right now we having to investigate a 3rd party IaaS solution in order to get functionality of this kind. This is a major pain point since we are trying to move to a completely PaaS footprint.

    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd shared this idea  · 
  7. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Governance » Azure Blueprints  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
    Greg Lloyd shared this idea  · 
  8. 194 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  9. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Web Apps » App Service Environment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd shared this idea  · 
  10. 47 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  11. 64 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  12. 64 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is something we’re thinking about, but would like to ensure that we’re providing a sufficiently robust set of capabilities within the template language syntax itself.

    What scenarios are “overly complicated and hard to maintain”? This will help us understand where we need to invest.

    Greg Lloyd commented  · 

    During one of the ignite demos someone presented a way to leverage event grid, function apps, and a cosmos db. Using this they should that they were exporting ARM Templates based on changes to a Resource Group directly to cosmos db. The github repo is called 'azure-arm-events'.

  13. 68 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are working on supporting the copy() function in outputs – combined with the reference() function should help with these scenarios. We will email you once it is completed. Feel free to reach out if you have any additional feedback.

    Greg Lloyd commented  · 

    I asked about this functionality during ignite and they mentioned that they want include this. Brian Moore did mention in his ignite session that you can do a reference() function within ARM can provide a resource. Hopefully this helps you, the link is below.

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/resource-group-template-functions-resource#reference

  14. 76 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  15. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  16. 23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Diagnostics and Monitoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  17. 163 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    25 comments  ·  Azure Management Groups » New Feature Request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Everyone,
    I apologize about the delay but Custom RBAC Support is now available in Production. You are able to to create role definitions at the MG scope and assign them to inherited MGs and Subs.

    There is a bug that is in the portal where the new custom role is not showing when you are trying to do a role assignment on an inherited child MG/Sub. This should be resolved soon and PowerShell, CLI, and API are all working. I will not do any announcements yet on the availability of the feature until the portal bug is fixed. Once that is fixed we will do blog announcements and I will mark the feature complete here.

    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  18. 297 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
    Greg Lloyd commented  · 

    Also would be good to have on Application Gateways too

  19. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Greg Lloyd commented  · 

    Highly highly second this! Only having the ability to define permissions with the read, write, action, or delete functions is very limiting. Especially when we have developers who will need to change an existing resources.

    The lack of the differentiation seems to be an oversight since they are two distinct pieces of functionality.

    Greg Lloyd supported this idea  · 
  20. 33 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Security and Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base