Davi Cavalheiro

My feedback

  1. 362 votes
    Sign in
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  18 comments  ·  Azure Backup » Retention and Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Davi Cavalheiro commented  · 

    Although the two solutions do not have perfectly identical characteristics, the basic principle is similar.

    I'm not saying that the price of Azure Backup should be the same as Amazon Glacier, since as you said yourself they are different products.

    But Microsoft could create a new product for Azure family , which is similar to Amazon Glacier.

    I work for some companies that use many Microsoft Azure services, including the Azure Backup, but when they need a solution to archive old information to historical records, the Amazon Glacier is the one with the best cost benefit. I believe that many other companies have similar needs.

    I wish Microsoft had a service like this, because I prefer to work with Microsoft instead of the Amazon, and I think there are others who think so too.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Davi Cavalheiro commented  · 

    Microsoft needs to offer a service similar to Amazon Glacier.
    With the same low prices for storing backups.
    And add the advantage of integration with Windows Backup.

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost storage service for data archiving and online backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.01 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    Davi Cavalheiro supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base