Sucursal Web

My feedback

  1. 119 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sucursal Web commented  · 

    Although is a valid and necessary CA addition for BYO certs, it’s also a valid first citizen option for auto provided and managed ones.

    In cases for lots of certs under the same Front Door, if Lets Encrypt is used to supply these, custom code must be put in place for replacing each cert every 3 months plus other management tasks. This sounds like a feature that, if provided by the platform itself, would ease the adoption for complex scenarios.

    Sucursal Web supported this idea  · 
  2. 517 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sucursal Web supported this idea  · 
  3. 310 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Support for both public and private IP at the same time is available on both V1 and V2 SKU. Customers can host multiple sites behind the same IP and port using multi-site listener today.

    Support for allowing same port on both public and private IP is in the roadmap.

    Sucursal Web supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base