Simon D'Morias

My feedback

  1. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  2. 104 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  3. 47 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Search » Data Types  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. While it is unlikely we’ll address this suggestion in the near future, we’ll reassess based on the number of votes it receives.

    With the private preview of complex types (api version 2018-11-11-Preview) you will be able to store a line and leverage it for geospatial queries.

    Thanks,
    Vinod
    Azure Search Product Team

    Simon D'Morias shared this idea  · 
  5. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Search » Indexing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  6. 96 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  7. 699 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    26 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  8. 38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  9. 42 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  10. 181 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  14 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  11. 869 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  97 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  12. 331 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » T-SQL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  13. 97 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Table Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  14. 1,152 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Folks,

    Thanks for the questions and suggestions. And apologies for not sharing any update on this thread for so long. We’ve been working on this problem and have announced changes on our official team blog (see here: https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2016/09/15/cleaning-up-the-azure-ad-and-microsoft-account-overlap/).

    First, we are acutely aware of the UX pain this is causing and we are sorry for this. We are trying to undo a decade and a half of systems divergence. There are literally hundreds of different engineering teams across Microsoft involved in this effort. So this is taking time.

    Second, we can’t easily “merge” two accounts, or allow IT to “take over” personal Microsoft accounts. There are two main hurdles: (1) The terms of service are fundamentally different for the two account types and (2) they are based on different technologies with different stacks (different identifiers, SDKs, token formats, etc.). We’re working to converge the two stacks but again this…

    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 
  15. 141 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Additional Services » Team Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias shared this idea  · 
  16. 1,218 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    46 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Simon D'Morias supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base