Irakliy

My feedback

  1. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Database for PostgreSQL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Irakliy commented  · 

    A very interesting alternative to PgBouncer: https://github.com/yandex/odyssey

    Irakliy shared this idea  · 
  2. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Additional Services » Key Vault  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  3. 93 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Additional Services » Key Vault  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  4. 125 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Security and Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Database for PostgreSQL » Extension  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Irakliy shared this idea  · 
  6. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Event Grid » Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Irakliy commented  · 

    Yes, queues is what I currently use - but in 90% of cases I don't need delays. So, one component would put a message in a queue and the other one would pop the message right away. Event gird would work very well for such scenarios (and actually would fit the paradigm better than queues). However, in 10% of cases I need to delay messages - sometimes by a couple of seconds, sometimes by a few minutes. So, currently, my choice is either stay with queues or use queues for 10% of my needs and event grid for the other 90% (which I think would add complexity). Being able to use event grid for all use cases, would be ideal.

    Irakliy shared this idea  · 
  7. 58 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  8. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » DDoS Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  9. 158 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Gremlin API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 83 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Moving this work item to unplanned, as it is clear that this request is no for a global throughput limit.

    We do now offer the ability to limit your maximum instances in the Premium plan, which will allow you to avoid swamping downstream resources. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-premium-plan#plan-and-sku-settings

    We prioritized that above a max call per X limit, because our only control to limit throughput is to outright deny some number of requests above a threshold.

    Keep the feedback coming!
    Alex
    Azure Functions Team

    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  11. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Database for PostgreSQL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Irakliy shared this idea  · 
  12. 153 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  11 comments  ·  Storage » Queues  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Irakliy commented  · 

    Wold be great to have this! 7-days is way too restrictive.

    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  13. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Database for PostgreSQL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Irakliy shared this idea  · 
  14. 1,312 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    38 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of blob storage lifecycle management. The feature set offers a rich, rule-based policy engine which you can use to transition your data to the best access tier and to expire data at the end of its lifecycle. See our post on the Azure Blog to get started: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-blob-storage-lifecycle-management-public-preview/preview/.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at DLMFeedback@microsoft.com.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Irakliy commented  · 

    Any news on this feature?

    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  15. 4,623 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    113 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  16. 4,837 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    158 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.

    Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Irakliy commented  · 

    would be great to have this feature

    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  17. 1,292 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  18. 897 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    There are multiple responses to this suggestion.

    Support for SQL-like syntax for UPDATE, DELETE and INSERT INTO are not on our road map at this time.

    However, the underlying functionality for an UPDATE, SET is essentially a PATCH. This functionality we are actively working on. See this User Voice item here to track for future updates. https://feedback.azure.com/forums/263030-azure-cosmos-db/suggestions/6693091-be-able-to-do-partial-updates-on-document

    Thank you for your suggestion.

    Irakliy supported this idea  · 
  19. 1,121 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Irakliy supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base