Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Monitor-Log Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for your feedback and its now open for the user community to upvote & comment on. This allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  4. 328 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Lot of customers used "OMS" in the workspace names, one reason why we need the possibility to rename

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Still required, I hate if a vendor does offer a feedback portal and does no act,answer on it .....

  5. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Monitor » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote & comment on. This allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Monitor-Log Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    have it in the o365 solution for usage reports with the most typical activites, same like spo

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  7. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  8. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  9. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  10. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  11. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    important, I need the IIS logs from 4 SharePoint server only, not from all SP farm clients, server, Performance and cost impact.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    or also easy overview which machine is not part of any update deployment plan

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  13. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Automation » Role Based Access Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Would role based access control solve this problem for you?

    Also, are you interested in protecting runbooks from being started or just edited and deleted?

    Thanks,
    Beth

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Also see improvements, who can create, modify, delete, schedule and start a runbook, credential management maybe other responsibility. Also if you look on log analytics integration, runbook accounts mapped to one OMS workspace and without permission concept risky from cost and stability view.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Monitor-Log Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » PowerShell  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 110 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  17. 1,676 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    173 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    no feedback is bad, no update will it come and when or not an option

  18. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hi,
    also looking on using groups like service based, production or preproduction, server roles like SharePoint Server etc...maybe one way scom dynamic group solution integration

  19. 93 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 52 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Here the requirement is clear/obvious. We just have not prioritized this work yet.

    The overall ‘performance’ data collection needs to be refined – not just for Linux.

    Right now we only collect/provide hourly aggregates of some specific performance counters related to HyperV for the ‘Capacity Intelligence Pack’ scenario.

    Real time monitoring scenario might need some different shape of performance data to start with, before we enable this for Linux or for Windows alike, i.e. http://feedback.azure.com/forums/267889-azure-operational-insights/suggestions/6519061-collect-custom-windows-performance-counters

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    in general more interested on trending and forecasting disk space database sizing and cpu menory and network load

Feedback and Knowledge Base