Philip Coupar
My feedback
-
3 votes
-
87 votes
This isn’t available yet and we’re leaving the ask under review for now. We’ll come back to the idea when we have news.
Thanks,
Oded -
40 votes
-
65 votes
-
78 votes
Thank you for the feedback. We will look into this.
-
1,223 votes
Thanks, we hear you.
.
Right now I can’t give you a date but we continue to listen. -
33 votes
-
1,915 votes
Hey folks, sorry for the late update. Some backend changes were made to alleviate this issue but I believe it doesn’t solve it for everyone yet. Let me go get some details and come back with a better update. Thanks!
John
-
348 votes
We have a sample for this use case here: https://github.com/azure-ad-b2c/samples/tree/master/policies/invite
Let us know what you think and if this fits your use case.
-
1,142 votes
We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.
That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.
Apologies for the delay.
/Parakh
Old message:
We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C? -
458 votes
Please check the new capability we recently unveiled called Wrangling Data Flows, available in preview! Wrangling Data Flow allows you to discover and explore your data using the familiar Power Query Online mashup editor to do data preparation, and then execute at scale using Spark runtime.
Sign up for preview access at: https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=v4j5cvGGr0GRqy180BHbR9-OHbkcd7NIvtztVhbGIU9UNk5QM0dSWkFDSkFPUlowTFJMRVZUUUZGRi4u and check out more details at https://aka.ms/wranglingdfdocs
-
78 votes
-
61 votes
-
155 votes
We have done a lot of progress on this area in last few years, and we would like to know if there is something scenario specific that you guys are looking for?
Thanks,
Azure Portal Team -
50 votes
-
427 votes
This is in our roadmap, we will update here once we have a firmer date set.
-Azure Billing team
-
114 votesunder review · 2 comments · Azure portal » Resource management · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
-
195 votesunplanned · 16 comments · Azure portal » Resource management · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
-
1,538 votes
At this point our recommendation is to move resources into a new Resource Group with the new name.
-
1,112 votes
Hey Folks,
We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.
We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.
Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.
Thanks,
Azure Portal Team
