AdamM

My feedback

  1. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdamM commented  · 

    Are you still evaluating this? This is coming up to being 3 years old...!

  2. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. 29 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. 29 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdamM supported this idea  · 
  6. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdamM supported this idea  · 
  7. 111 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdamM supported this idea  · 
  8. 89 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Ibrahim,

    What issue are you trying to solve? What use case would this be used for?

    It seems to me that placing a restart option on the plan level might do more harm than good, by resetting the memory on all the apps under the plan. Depending on your scenario, auto-heal would be a great solution to solve individual machine issues. See a video by my colleagues here for more details: https://channel9.msdn.com/Series/Windows-Azure-Web-Sites-Tutorials/Auto-Healing-an-Azure-App-Service

    Placing this idea under review for now until I understand what’s at the base of the request here.

    Thanks!
    Oded

    AdamM commented  · 

    I've always thought that scaling the App Service Plan essentially "restarts" the server, eg from Basic to Standard, or Standard to Premium.

  9. 136 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Web Apps » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdamM supported this idea  · 
  10. 340 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdamM supported this idea  · 
  11. 311 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    unplanned  ·  9 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdamM supported this idea  · 
  12. 77 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdamM supported this idea  · 
  13. 407 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. 706 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  16 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. 721 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Azure Search » Indexing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. 1,146 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  35 comments  ·  Azure Search » Client SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. 76 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Search » Crawlers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Conditional Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the suggestion Peter. Can you give a bit more detail on the use case? You can apply conditional access policy to Azure SQL today. Is the additional requirement here to lock down access to specific devices (for example: not all compliant devices)?

    -Caleb

    AdamM supported this idea  · 
  19. 1,487 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    154 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdamM supported this idea  · 
  20. 88 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdamM commented  · 

    Yes, several improvements have been made, but not the ones requested in this feedback post.

    We still cannot increase the eDTU click stops in a granular way. It goes from 400 straight to 800!

    Why can this not at least follow the previous click stops: 100-200-300-400, in 100 increments (it would be even better if it was more granular with 10/15/20/25 click stops, but I would settle for consistent 100's at this stage).

    AdamM supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base