Douglas James Boyd

My feedback

  1. 1,923 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    88 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Great news – static IP range for Azure Integration Runtime is now available in all ADF regions! You can whitelist specific IP ranges for ADF as part of firewall rules. The IPs are documented here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/azure-integration-runtime-ip-addresses#azure-integration-runtime-ip-addresses-specific-regions. Static IP ranges for gov cloud and China cloud will be published soon!

    Please refer to this blog post on how you can use various mechanisms including trusted Azure service and static IP to secure data access through ADF:
    https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-data-factory/azure-data-factory-now-supports-static-ip-address-ranges/ba-p/1117508

    Service tag support will be made available in next few weeks. Please stay tuned!

    If your network security requirement calls for ADF support for VNet and cannot be met using Trusted Azure service (released in Oct 2019), static IP range (released in Jan 2020), or service tag (upcoming), please vote for VNet feature here: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/270578-data-factory/suggestions/37105363-data-factory-should-be-able-to-use-vnet-without-re

    Douglas James Boyd shared this idea  · 
  2. 71 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Networking » Network Watcher  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Douglas James Boyd commented  · 

    we always place network related services in a dedicated Resource Group, as they generally have a different lifecycle and RBAC requirements

  3. 152 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  14 comments  ·  Lab Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Douglas James Boyd supported this idea  · 
  4. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Backup » IaaS VM  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Douglas James Boyd shared this idea  · 
  5. 334 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    56 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Douglas James Boyd supported this idea  · 
  6. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Douglas James Boyd shared this idea  · 
  7. 1,121 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Douglas James Boyd commented  · 

    When you attempt to move VMs created from a marketplace image (EG SQL Cluster) it fails with this error message: "Resource move is not supported for resources that have plan"

    Is this going to be addressed?

  8. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Douglas James Boyd commented  · 

    I was then asked to raise a subsequent case [REG:116081714555243], upon which i was asked to post on here. This is the response from paid Premier Support!

    "I pulled information about one of the VM from your subscription and it has more than 80 characters

    Can you submit product enhancement request on the following link

    https://feedback.azure.com/forums/256299-site-recovery "

    Douglas James Boyd shared this idea  · 
  9. 2,117 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    283 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    Douglas James Boyd supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Douglas James Boyd commented  · 

    Please please please please please add interactive console access as many here ask (surely for good reasons!???) Network appliances such as barracudas are prime examples where connectivity loss may not be fixed by simply seeing the screen, or resetting ssh access. There are steps related to routing which if misconfigured mean not only do you lose access to the VM, but also have to request the license again. Equally, the diagnostics are not on by default and so when you need it, it's not switched on and on every occasion I've tried to enable it on a troubled VM, it's failed. We need the last resort available to us- we need to be able to connect to console! You don't need it often, but when you need it, you NEED it!

  10. 215 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  ruturajd responded

    We are working to understand the requirements of this feature and deliver it. If you have any scenarios or examples that might help us take a decision kindly give a detailed comment below.

    Douglas James Boyd supported this idea  · 
  11. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The first part of your request is under discussion – it’s something we hear frequently and are thinking about quite a bit!

    For domain join, please see https://github.com/Azure/azure-quickstart-templates/tree/master/201-vm-domain-join

    If you’re having issues with DSC or custom script extensions working as expected, please open an item in the Virtual Machines section – the right folks will see it there :)

    Douglas James Boyd shared this idea  · 
  13. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Backup » PaaS Backup  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Douglas James Boyd shared this idea  · 
  14. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Douglas James Boyd shared this idea  · 
  15. 2,059 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    113 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Douglas James Boyd commented  · 

    I agree, this is a considerable hidden cost, and it seems daft that you pay more for a router than you do for a server. If you have a network with multiple segments, the costs rack up.

Feedback and Knowledge Base