Marco

My feedback

  1. 237 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure IoT Solution Accelerators » Suggestion  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco shared this idea  · 
  3. 63 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  6 comments  ·  Azure Monitor-Application Insights » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco supported this idea  · 
  4. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco commented  · 

    There are some scenarios where latency is more important than the risk of lost messages. TCP retransmission makes things even worse while sometimes a lost message data can just be superseded by a new packet flowing at decent data rate.

    Marco supported this idea  · 
  5. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco supported this idea  · 
  6. 49 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is not in our plans for now but definitively an interesting scenario.
    As of today you can already do so in different ways such as compressing data in your device code before sending and using an Azure Function on the back end that will be triggered each time a compressed message arrives. Not totally integrated into IoT Hub but gives you the choice of the compression format and flexibility in routing messages before decompressing content (using message headers for routing).

    Marco commented  · 

    JSON+gzip works well, but it can't be used with direct messages, as an example. A native implementation would be better

    Marco supported this idea  · 
  7. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco supported this idea  · 
  8. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco shared this idea  · 
  9. 91 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco supported this idea  · 
  10. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco supported this idea  · 
  11. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco supported this idea  · 
  12. 189 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Azure Monitor-Application Insights » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco commented  · 

    Adding my vote to this. If my API generates a 400, I'd like to see what's been sent to it.

    Marco supported this idea  · 
  13. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Marco supported this idea  · 
  14. 55 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco shared this idea  · 
  15. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco supported this idea  · 
  16. 771 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    45 comments  ·  Notification Hubs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco commented  · 

    +1 still waiting, any update is welcome!

  17. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure DDoS Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco supported this idea  · 
  18. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Monitor-Application Insights » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    There are natural PII concerns in auto-collecting POST parameters, and it’s something, as Dan mentioned, you can do yourself with telemetry initializer. That said, please keep upvoting so we can see how many folks are impacted by not having a more streamlined way of collecting POST parameters.
    Best, Michael
    -AppInsights Product Management

    Marco supported this idea  · 
  19. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco supported this idea  · 
  20. 135 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marco supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base