Gerald Wiltse

My feedback

  1. 5,057 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    127 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gerald Wiltse commented  · 

    It turns out that if you use the Mongo driver, you are able do partial updates. I have no idea how it achieves this if the REST API does not have any documented mechanism, but it does.

  2. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure IoT (Hub, DPS, SDKs)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gerald Wiltse commented  · 

    This would be nice, machine.io is an amazing iot solution which does this. Shows a good precedent.

  3. 106 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure IoT (Hub, DPS, SDKs)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gerald Wiltse supported this idea  · 
  4. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gerald Wiltse commented  · 

    There's already a suggestion you may wish to vote for: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/216926-service-bus/suggestions/15257919-encrypted-queues One would expect that adding the encryption to service bus would propagate to services that are built on it.

  5. 59 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gerald Wiltse supported this idea  · 
  6. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gerald Wiltse shared this idea  · 
  7. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gerald Wiltse shared this idea  · 
  8. 43 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gerald Wiltse commented  · 

    We are also wondering about the potential synergies between ASA and Operational insights/OMS. It does seem that Op Insights would just provide some really great functionality around server logs, while it would be amazing to also work with the data in PowerBI via ASA. It's worth noting, we currently only want the log analytic functionality of OMS, so we would like that to somehow be a consumable unit without baggage. Hopefully someone has a vision about all that.

  9. 72 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Automation » Desired State Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gerald Wiltse supported this idea  · 
  10. 550 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    48 comments  ·  Azure Backup » PaaS Backup  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gerald Wiltse supported this idea  · 
  11. 278 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  8 comments  ·  Azure Backup » IaaS VM  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gerald Wiltse supported this idea  · 
  12. 1,913 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  71 comments  ·  Azure Backup  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gerald Wiltse supported this idea  · 
  13. 465 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  15 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gerald Wiltse shared this idea  · 
  14. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gerald Wiltse supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gerald Wiltse commented  · 

    I am amazed at how frustrating and unforgiving the new portal is when creating resources. Here is one specific element that can be fairly easily improved. This has been a problem for over a year, I assumed it would get fixed quickly. It didn't.

    Here's what's happened multiple times.

    In a hurry, browse SQL Databases, filter by my desired subscription "IT Subscription". Database I want doesn't exist yet, need to create:

    Click Add Database
    Define a Name
    Select "new database server" -> Define all the associated options for that
    Select Pricing Tier
    Select Collation Options
    Select Resource Group... wait... these aren't the right resource groups.
    Select correct subscription.... oh god, everything lost, start from scratch
    :(

    This is a very basic UX Flaw. Because resource group and database server are dependent children of the subscription selection, they should not appear as neighbors to it in the selection list, and CERTAINLY should not appear BEFORE it...

    Please at LEAST make Subscription the FIRST choice on the list, since it determines the options that follow. A more appropriate fix would be to represent them as parent/children. In the case of the new UI, I suppose this would spawn more blades which is pretty gross IMO. Still it might be the right solution.

    However, a more broadly useful improvement for this situation would be to permit the migration of things from subscription to subscription, and RG to RG after built.

    I know, there are other requests for this already, and i'm sure it's extremely difficult on the backend (otherwise it would be done). This is one of those reasons why it is so.

  15. 717 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  115 comments  ·  Azure portal » Search + navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gerald Wiltse supported this idea  · 
  16. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gerald Wiltse commented  · 

    I have looked into this. Fantastic job on packaging this thing and making the deployment from GITHUB to azure so turnkey. I'm truly amazed. This sendgrid connector will no doubt be a very popular addition.

    It seems to do what it promises, but not the particular feature I requested. My Request was to receive email into Azure Logic App the way sendgrid does.

    Thank you for your efforts nontheless.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gerald Wiltse commented  · 

    Thank you for executing this. I will take a look and report back.

    Gerald Wiltse shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base