Vince

My feedback

  1. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince supported this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince supported this idea  · 
  3. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince supported this idea  · 
  4. 128 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince supported this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Cloud Shell » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince supported this idea  · 
    Vince shared this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Web Apps » Linux  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince commented  · 

    In response to "...Does this meet the needs?"
    It's a step in the right direction, but it does not meet the original request as clarified in my "Obviously I wasn't clear enough..." reply. Please see that comment.
    Thanks

    Vince commented  · 

    Obviously I wasn't clear enough. I am well aware of App Service's support for containers. My issue with the current implementation is that it's simply one instance of a container per node. I would like to be able to host a variety of containers, each with a different number of instances, across my App Service Plan nodes. For example, I would like to be able to create an App Service Plan with 3 medium nodes, and then deploy to those nodes 12 instances of one container, and 5 instances of another container, and 2 of another container. And I would like "App Service Container Orchestration" to manage those instances, providing orchestration features such as placement, scheduling, load balancing, monitoring, etc. Make sense?
    Again, I know this is asking a lot, but if you could provide those features with the ease-of-use that is typical of App Service, that would be an amazing offering!

    Vince shared this idea  · 
  7. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Logic Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince shared this idea  · 
  8. 231 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    63 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Admin Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince supported this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince shared this idea  · 
  10. 3,049 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    125 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi everyone,

    We recently announce the General Availability of Azure Active Directory Domain Services (Azure AD DS) authentication for Azure Files! By enabling integration with Azure AD DS, you can mount your Azure file share over SMB using Azure AD credentials from Azure AD DS domain joined Windows VMs with NTFS ACLs enforced. For more details, please refer to our blog post:http://aka.ms/azure-file-aadds-authentication-ga-blog.

    A part of the GA announcement, we shared the upcoming plan to extend the authentication support to Active Directory (AD) either hosted on-premises or in cloud. If you need an Azure Files solution with AD authentication today, you can consider installing Azure File Sync (AFS) on your Windows File Servers where AD integration is fully supported.

    If you are interested to hear future updates on Azure Files Active Directory Authentication, please complete this sign-up survey:https://aka.ms/AzureFilesADAuthPreviewSurvey.

    Thanks,
    Azure Files Team

    Vince supported this idea  · 
  11. 76 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Storage » Managed Disk Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince commented  · 

    Oh, ya, that'd be great. Would love to be able to scale up/down the IOPS as needed. But if that would delay this feature, then I'd prefer that as a future enhancement.

    Vince shared this idea  · 
  12. 87 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince shared this idea  · 
  13. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince shared this idea  · 
  14. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince shared this idea  · 
  15. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince shared this idea  · 
  16. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince supported this idea  · 
  17. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince shared this idea  · 
  18. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince shared this idea  · 
  19. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  4 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince shared this idea  · 
  20. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vince supported this idea  · 
    Vince shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base