Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 49 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 89 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Our long-term goal is to have every service within Azure publish events, however, we have yet to begin work on this one.

    As always, we’re passing the feedback along, but make sure you reach out to Storage as well so they hear your voice directly!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 394 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    50 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi all,

    We’re pleased to announce a public preview of our Key Vault references feature, which you can learn more about here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/simplifying-security-for-serverless-and-web-apps-with-azure-functions-and-app-service/

    There are some limitations to the initial preview, but we’re hoping to address those very soon. We’re looking forward to your feedback!

    Thank you,
    Matthew, Azure Functions team

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 149 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Azure portal » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey,

    This is something we’re still actively working on. It has a been a big area of investment and it still is moving forward. We keep investing in performance, both from a client and server side perspective.

    We have a few things coming in the near future which should help address some of the initial UI performance issues. We’re also heavily engaged with all of our partners driving a broad effort to improve performance across the portal for all experiences.

    If you have any specific areas which are causing pain please feel free to reach out to me or comment and state if we can contact you, it would be great to understand the common pain points.

    Cheers,
    Sean.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 229 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 303 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Would be great if gzip support could be added as part of this update!

  7. 1,383 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    83 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    ATS is still a great solution that works well. It is quite unique compared to what AWS and Google offer.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 148 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    I’ve gotten a few questions about this item recently, so I just wanted to give a more detailed status. We still have this on the backlog; it hasn’t been forgotten. But we don’t have a clear timeline for when we would get to it right now. The “unplanned” status just means that it can’t be tied to a timeline, but we do think this is a valid request that we would like to have in the product.
    - Matthew

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Shared Access Signatures (SAS) may provide a basic authenticated/unauthenticated scenario to reduce abuse and traffic generation which would incur charges if the function did the validation itself. This was a big problem with AWS Lama until they fixed it with the API gateway hook.

    I'm currently fronting my async functions with a queue and SAS. The SAS model is simple and effective.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    AWS finally addressed this for Lamba. They gave you a hook in the pipeline of their API gateway to process an auth token and return into the context session attributes.

    Better than nothing but there needs to be native support ODIC (mainly JWT validation and decoding) and OAuth support. Not everyone uses Azure AD as the OAuth server to issue API tokens and token translation for OAuth/ODIC is problematic. There is no STS.

  9. 1,031 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 50 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree. At least for external calls to the REST API (not internal to azure). Table Storage is an awesome backend for large scale mobile and SPA apps. However bandwidth is quite expensive and gzip on average results in a 7-8x reduction for JSON query results. The large payload size also takes significantly longer to download and is less responsive.

    Understand turning on gzip could increase server load that's why perhaps just for external client IP's. As the internal network has plenty of bandwidth and is low latency it seems a non issue.

    The server load thing is probably a reason why it's not supported - all adds up at scale. I'd be willing to pay a higher storage transaction rate as the bandwidth savings alone would offset any cost. At least for blob storage the client can manually gzip the files when uploading and set the correct meta data.

    Just gziping HTTP GET's would suffice.

  11. 64 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Storage » Storage Emulator  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. Providing this functionality is on our backlog but there is no ETA we can share at this time. We have logged this request in the GitHub repository for the new open source storage emulator, Azurite. Please continue the discussion there: https://github.com/Azure/Azurite/issues/39. We will provide updates when they become available on this ask as well as in the GitHub repository. For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 708 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base