Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 354 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I've come to the conclusion it's time to move to AWS, cearly MS can't be bothered here.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Yes please provide an update. ANY self respecting web app/site will not want its users wating several seconds while views are compiled.

    Anonymous commented  · 
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 398 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  7 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    So what's the latest?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Pre-compile views will do it, it's unacceptable that users need to stare at a white screen for 1-5 seconds before anything loads: http://feedback.azure.com/forums/169386-cloud-services-web-and-worker-role/suggestions/5863196-allow-easy-asp-net-precompilation-in-cloud-project

  3. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    RAM on all the general purpose instance sizes is far too low. If you consider A0 which has 0.75GB RAM, After the OS, there is practically nothing left for application use. It's a similar story for A1.

    Even Microsoft's own minimum RAM specification for Windows Server 2012 is at least 2 GB with a recommendation of 8 GB. RAM on A0-A3 needs to be seriously increased.

    Ideally we should be able to specify our own RAM requirements when creating a VM/Cloud Service.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 415 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 619 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    23 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    SSL only requires multiple IPs when the client is on Windows XP, using an older version of Internet Explorer. Most modern browsers support SNI (Server Name Indication) and thus don’t require multiple IPs.

    Support for multiple IPs is under review in the team.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 196 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  16 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 4,783 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    152 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.

    Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Under review 8 months ago, can we have an update? SSL is becoming increasingly important especially for business services in the cloud.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base