AdminAzure Networking Team
(Product Manager, Microsoft Azure)
My feedback
-
131 votes
Thank you for the feedback. We’ll look into whether this can be included in our roadmap.
AdminAzure Networking Team
(Product Manager, Microsoft Azure)
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
-
6 votes
Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature
-
295 votes
Apologies. There was apparently a misunderstanding and the status has been corrected.
This specific feedback item is for NAT from private IP space to private IP address
AdminAzure Networking Team
(Product Manager, Microsoft Azure)
supported this idea
·
-
38 votesAdminAzure Networking Team
(Product Manager, Microsoft Azure)
supported this idea
·
AdminAzure Networking Team
(Product Manager, Microsoft Azure)
shared this idea
·
-
55 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. We are working to improve this experience.
The new V2 (Autoscaling) SKU reduces the update times to under a min in most cases. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/application-gateway-autoscaling-zone-redundant
-
387 votes
We have raised the limit to 100 recently. We are regularly reviewing the limits and will continue to look for opportunities to raise the limits even further. If you have scenarios requiring limits higher than what is supported, please add your scenario details here (if you are comfortable with that) or raise an issue with Azure support and we will get back to you.
We are working on supporting wildcard listeners in the near term. As mentioned before, if you need more than 100 listeners you can open a support ticket with your specific scenario details. The current limit of 100 is set based on performance tests and we are unable to set it to a much higher value for all customers at this time as it may degrade performance depending on individual scenarios. That being said, we continue to review periodically and optimize our data plane so that higher limits may be possible.
-
1,130 votes
Thank you for all the votes and feedback. We have started work on this and the capability will be supported soon. If you would like to get in touch with us to discuss your scenarios, please fill this form: https://aka.ms/ApplicationGatewayCohort
Please be assured we are working on this feature as one of our top priorities and will announce it as soon as it's ready.
-
224 votesstarted · 15 comments · Networking » Azure Front Door Service · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We would like to hear more feedback on this. Can you explain your scenarios a bit more? Azure Front Door is different than Azure Load Balancer particularly for the fact that it is Layer 7 i.e. HTTP/HTTPS. So, waiting and not getting a feedback from the backend/origin/app server for 30 seconds for a web request is unusual.
-
56 votes
valid suggestion subject to upvote
SNAT on incoming connections is done do ensure symmetric routing across the underlying firewall nodes for returning packets. This is needed as the Standard Load Balancer has TCP state checking rules today that will drop the session if the returning packet comes from a different firewall physical node. This will be fixed in the future, but no ETA yet.
-
9 votes
Thanks. We will add this feature to our backlog to consider for a future release.
-
106 votes
Thanks for the feedback. This feature is high on our list - tentatively for H1 2019.
-
3 votes
We are working on adding Service Tags to Azure Firewall network rules and hope to have it released in Q1 2019.
-
2 votes
Please elaborate on the scenario. You can already provide permissions on a zone to a specific user such that user is able to manage records within that zone but not other zones. Please see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/dns/dns-protect-zones-recordsets#zone-level-rbac
-
3 votes
Thanks for the feedback. Not in near term plans.
— ChristianHTTP and HTTPS probes use an HTTP GET. Can you please expand on the scenario where something other than 200 is a valid response for this operation? 201 for example is typically used for a POST.
-
1 vote
Thanks for the feedback. Agree with the feedback on destination address. We will explore having it as a drop down list that provides the firewall public IPs. This should eliminate also the confusion with the translated address.
-
3 votes
Thank you for the feedback. Can you clarify please if you are asking for the health probe to close the connection
a) WITH a 4 way close or
b) WITHOUT a 4 way close and send RST instead?
— Christian@hisashima load balancer uses (a) today. why do you need the behavior described in (b). can you elaborate on the scenario and impact please?
-
735 votes
We are evaluating this feature ask. However, it is not on our immediate roadmap.
-Rohin KWhile we don't offer a 301 redirect service, we just announced support for Alias records which will let you point to any Public IP-backed resource (such as Application Gateway) or a Traffic Manager profile, from your zone apex. This may be an alternative if the need is to make sure both the zone apex and say the www subdomain point to the same load balanced application. For more details see https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/announcing-alias-records-for-azure-dns/
-
320 votes
Thanks for the feedback, we are working on enabling ASG references across subscriptions/VNets, it’s currently on our plans
AdminAzure Networking Team
(Product Manager, Microsoft Azure)
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
Hi, can you please indicate to which article/documentation you're referring?
Azure Firewall now supports up to 100 public IPs. See more here - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/firewall/overview#multiple-public-ip-addresses