AdminAzure Networking Team
(Admin, Microsoft Azure)
My feedback
-
3 votes2 comments · Networking » VPN Connectivity (Point-to-Site, Site-to-Site) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Hi,
Currently, the gateway private IP addresses are not required for configurations or operations, other than the GatewaySubnet range. They should have been hidden from users. The gateway resource model does not have a field for those either.
There may be use cases for new features down the road. We will update the gateway resource model accordingly and expose those properly.
Thanks,
Yushun [MSFT] -
30 votes5 comments · Networking » Domain Name Service (DNS, Traffic Manager) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Azure DNS Private Zones is in Public Preview, which supports split-horizon scenarios.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/dns/private-dns-overviewWe will support non-empty Vnets very soon. Stay tuned !
Hello, we are working on supporting existing (non-empty) VNETs. This is coming very soon ! Stay tuned.
-
14 votes
Thank you for the feedback. We now have a report that is generated weekly on Mondays: Azure Service Tags JSON (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=56519). This file includes all of the Service Tags and data by regions. This is an improvement over previous files as it includes tagging by Service Tag. We recommend you move to using this file and check weekly for updates. The file is broken out by Cloud (I.e. Public) and region (i.e., West US 2). We will take the RSS Feed request under advisement.
-
4 votes
Thanks for your suggestion, it is an identified requirement and we are evaluating it to reduce frequency from one hour to near real-time.
-
1 vote
We have noted this and will soon roll out a fix for multiple app gateways
-
7 votes3 comments · Networking » VPN Connectivity (Point-to-Site, Site-to-Site) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the feedback. The status of this ask is a bit complicated – it’s partially working, but partially in progress:
1. For existing SSTP P2S VPN, there is no solution but to download the VPN client package again.
2. For IKEv2 P2S VPN, it works by P2S client reconnecting to the Azure VPN gateway. Once they connect again, they will get the new routes. This will apply to changes in VNet address spaces (including VNet peering), newly added S2S/VNet-to-VNet connections, or new routes learned via BGP.
3. The caveat for (2) is that it currently works on Mac and Linux, but Windows require a KB/Update that will be released shortly.
We will provide an update to this item once the Windows update is available.
Thanks,
Yushun [MSFT]Thanks for the feedback - there are two aspects to this ask:
1. Azure P2S route refresh on the client side
2. App Service to leverage the route refresh capabilityThe work is in progress for (1), but it will not be in band due to protocol limit. For IKEv2 P2S VPN, simply reconnecting P2S clients will enable the client side to learn the new routes. I explained a bit more in another similar ask and will merge this ask to that main item.
Once that's available, will see how App Service can leverage this.
Thanks,
Yushun [MSFT] -
13 votes2 comments · Networking » Domain Name Service (DNS, Traffic Manager) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We didn’t see a reply on your specific AD setup. Please feel free to add more detail so we can understand the request more thoroughly.
Hi Will, could you provide more details about your AD setup ? Is it hosted in Azure, or OnPrem ? Also, could you clarify what you mean by "Azure Tenant" in this context.
-
4 votes2 comments · Networking » Domain Name Service (DNS, Traffic Manager) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Have you tried the Activity Logs feature to see if it handles your use case ? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/resource-group-audit
Have you tried the Activity Logs feature to see if it handles your use case ? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/resource-group-audit
-
1 voteunder review · 1 comment · Networking » Domain Name Service (DNS, Traffic Manager) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
This is on our immediate backlog and will soon be supported. Stay tuned !
-
235 votesplanned · 10 comments · Networking » Virtual Networks (VNET) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Unfortunately we do not have any updates at this time, but we will update this post whe the status changes.
-
71 votes
On Application Gateway, backend health is available. Refer to documentation at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/application-gateway-diagnostics.
-
30 votes
Currently inbound internet traffic on port ranges 65503-65534 should be opened for health probes to work. This is documented in FAQ at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/application-gateway-faq.
Thanks,
Amit -
1 vote
Monitoring communication between containers on the same node is not currently supported with Network Watcher. Thank you for your feedback and we will review your suggestion as we continue to improve the service.
Monitoring communication between containers on the same node is not currently supported with Network Watcher. Thank you for your feedback and we will review your suggestion as we continue to improve the service.
-
19 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. We are still considering including this in our roadmap.
This is still being considered.
-
27 votes
Idea of subnet expansion is in review. The topology view showing VNets, subnets and VMs under that is now available through Netwatcher which was just announced to preview. More information here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/updates/public-preview-network-watcher/
— Narayan [MSFT]
-
76 votes
Hi Gaurav
Thanks for the feedback, we are exploring options to cover this scenario, Application Security Groups it’s a good start
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-network/create-network-security-group-preview -
1 vote
Thanks for the feedback, Daire, we will look into this.
-
1 voteunder review · 1 comment · Networking » Virtual Networks (VNET) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Hi Lynn, help us understand your use case for this? You can achieve this on individual VMs in the VNet. This should help.
-
56 votes
This is now in our planning.
Hi Trond, this is an interesting ask, great feedback, This is in road map. Thanks!
-
7 votes
Hi Deane, thank you for the feedback, This is a good ask, we are actively looking into it. This is in our road map.
— Anavi N [MSFT]
Taking offline with Farouk to further clarify.
Thanks,
Yushun [MSFT]