Christos Karras

My feedback

  1. 41 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christos Karras supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,023 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    66 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.

    That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.

    Apologies for the delay.

    /Parakh


    Old message:
    We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
    Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?

    Christos Karras commented  · 

    You say a workaround is available? Can we please know what the workaround is?

    Christos Karras supported this idea  · 
  3. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage » Storage Emulator  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christos Karras shared this idea  · 
  4. 583 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Christos Karras supported this idea  · 
  5. 80 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Our long-term goal is to have every service within Azure publish events, however, we have yet to begin work on this one.

    As always, we’re passing the feedback along, but make sure you reach out to Storage as well so they hear your voice directly!

    Christos Karras supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Cloud Shell » PowerShell  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christos Karras commented  · 

    +1000
    Something equivalent for the Bash CLI should also be available

    Christos Karras supported this idea  · 
  7. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Monitor-Log Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christos Karras shared this idea  · 
  8. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Monitor-Log Analytics » OMS Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christos Karras supported this idea  · 
  9. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christos Karras shared this idea  · 
  10. 359 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christos Karras supported this idea  · 
  11. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Storage » Storage Explorer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christos Karras shared this idea  · 
  12. 333 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. 72 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Christos Karras supported this idea  · 
  15. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Christos Karras shared this idea  · 
  16. 71 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Yes in the future we would like to enable this, but it needs work to define your own schema and fields first – not just their location.

    This general work is also needed for ‘generic’ log collection i.e. http://feedback.azure.com/forums/267889-azure-operational-insights/suggestions/7113030-collect-text-log-files

    Also, for doing ‘alerts’ you need to be able to create those alerts – check this idea http://feedback.azure.com/forums/267889-azure-operational-insights/suggestions/6519198-long-running-saved-searches-or-scheduled-that-ca

  17. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christos Karras shared this idea  · 
  18. 198 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  13 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christos Karras supported this idea  · 
  19. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christos Karras shared this idea  · 
  20. 77 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Moving this work item to unplanned, as it is clear that this request is no for a global throughput limit.

    We do now offer the ability to limit your maximum instances in the Premium plan, which will allow you to avoid swamping downstream resources. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-premium-plan#plan-and-sku-settings

    We prioritized that above a max call per X limit, because our only control to limit throughput is to outright deny some number of requests above a threshold.

    Keep the feedback coming!
    Alex
    Azure Functions Team

    Christos Karras supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base