VlaR

My feedback

  1. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    VlaR supported this idea  · 
  2. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Table API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have reviewed this request.

    While we are API compatible with Table storage we do not precisely match every behavior. Sorting is one of those. We do not have any current plans to support this but will put on our backlog.

    For a complete listing of where our implementation diverges from Table storage please see this article below.

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/faq#where-is-table-api-not-identical-with-azure-table-storage-behavior

    Thank you.

    VlaR shared this idea  · 
  3. 230 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hello,

    We are working on a new capability that will allow customers to move Azure resources from one region to another. Could you please fill out this small survey so that we can find out more details on your requirements and assist you with your ask soon :)

    aka.ms/region-move-survery

    Cheers,
    Rajani,
    Program Manager – Azure Team

    VlaR supported this idea  · 
  4. 100 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    triaged  ·  3 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    VlaR commented  · 

    The Cloud Services, supported by Azure Front Door, are hosted on cloudapp.net domain which does not have HTTPS and does not allow to issue SSL certificate for any subdomain. The self-signed certificate is the only option there.

    PS. Of course, you can buy some intermediate custom domain, buy a valid certificate for it, map this domain to your app.cloudapp.net and configure this intermediate domain as backend in Azure Front Door (with your real custom domain) - but this is a bit over-engineering...

    VlaR supported this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    VlaR shared this idea  · 
  6. 181 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. 747 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    VlaR supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,086 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    VlaR supported this idea  · 
  9. 47 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    VlaR supported this idea  · 
  10. 355 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    VlaR supported this idea  · 
  11. 462 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  28 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    VlaR commented  · 

    Would be nice to get at least rough estimated time when this could be ready...

  12. 63 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Diagnostics and Monitoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is very good feedback. Today we have separate datasources for what your quotas are (e.g. network, memory), and the metrics that we emit. Ideally, we could bring those two points together to give you a percentage of those metrics.

    Also, once these are exposed, they will automatically be available for autoscale — already today you can use any exposed metric for scaling.

    VlaR supported this idea  · 
  13. 289 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. 2,232 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    119 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    VlaR commented  · 

    This feature is very important for dev/test environments. Otherwise gateway "eats" biggest part of MSDN monthly credits.

    VlaR shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base