Trond Hindenes

My feedback

  1. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  6. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Web Apps » API Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback!

    Right now the workaround is to set your authentication/authorization option to enabled, but set the action for unauthenticated requests to “allow.” Then manually redirect unauthenticated requests to the secured endpoints to the authorization flow at /.auth/login/done.
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service-mobile/app-service-mobile-how-to-configure-active-directory-authentication#optional-configure-a-native-client-application

    We would like to add more robust support for multiple auth levels in the future. I am placing this item in “unplanned” to be used in future planning sessions.

    Thanks!
    Alex
    Azure App Service Team

    Trond Hindenes commented  · 

    The "authentication enabled" option is great for quick and easy auth-enabling of websites. It would be great if it had pathing support so that I could control which parts of the website got protected and which didn't.

    Trond Hindenes supported this idea  · 
  7. 605 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    28 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  8. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  9. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  10. 1,513 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    156 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes supported this idea  · 
  11. 127 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  15 comments  ·  Azure portal » Search + navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes commented  · 

    This should get high priority, as it would make the portal much more useable.

    Trond Hindenes supported this idea  · 
  12. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Azure Monitor-Log Analytics » Extensibility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  13. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Automation » Debugging and troubleshooting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  14. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Automation » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  15. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Automation » User Experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    started  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    We have currently fixed:
    1. Modify jobs list so that it does not scroll to the bottom of the page
    2. Added a refresh button to the streams blade (note this doesn’t help if you have more than 50 streams so we are still looking at other ways to improve viewing active streams)

    I’m leaving this open to track further improvements to the job and streams blades.

    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  16. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Automation » Hybrid  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  17. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  18. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Hi Trond,

    Thanks – this is something our team is aware of and has been on our backlogs.

    Thanks,
    Beth

    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
  19. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    started  ·  SMAUserVoice responded

    SMA ISE Add-on which allows you to test and debug runbooks from ISE has been released.

    powershellgallery.com/packages/SMAAuthoring..

    Check this blog post for more details – blogs.technet.microsoft.com/orchestrator/20..

    Trond Hindenes commented  · 

    I don't understand why MS is encouraging the use of the WAP portal for authoring. We already have two IDE's (ISE and Visual Studio), both are vastly better than the editing experience in the wap portal. I'm getting the feeling that MS doesn't understand the real use cases for SMA / Automation and their complexities.

    Trond Hindenes supported this idea  · 
  20. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Marketplace  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Trond Hindenes commented  · 

    Thanks for your comment Thao. My point is: If I use the "search" feature and for instance search for "redis", i get all services related to redis. There is no way for me to tell what each result is. Some may be VM gallery items, and some may be the actual redis cache service in azure. There's just no way to tell. We need a way to filter by Azure Service to clarify the type of item in search results and the list.

    Trond Hindenes shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base