Samir FARHAT (MVP)

My feedback

  1. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  ruturajd responded

    This is a very new ask. Could you give some idea around any other requirement you have in the case? Types of VMs, networking info etc. We have this on our radar but would like to know more to deliver a great feature.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) commented  · 

    Already possible with ASR using inmage. But not yet perfect

  3. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) shared this idea  · 
  4. 783 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    16 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Storage » Managed Disk Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) commented  · 

    I would say 'Increase the number of attached Disks per VM'
    Indeed, the Max datat disk limitation is sometimes disruptive.

    Samir FARHAT (MVP) supported this idea  · 
  6. 86 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) shared this idea  · 
  7. 1,280 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    unplanned  ·  31 comments  ·  Azure Backup » IaaS VM  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) commented  · 

    I think this is included on the Project Venus roadmap
    https://www.petri.com/microsoft-project-venus-extending-azure-backup-features

  8. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) shared this idea  · 
  9. 37 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    Samir FARHAT (MVP) supported this idea  · 
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) shared this idea  · 
  10. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) commented  · 

    I have posted the same idea in the Azure Preview portal uservoice.
    This is where we should post ideas about the Azure Portal fetaures, not here.
    http://feedback.azure.com/forums/223579-azure-preview-portal/suggestions/8414958-azure-portal-home-page-s-management-tasks-shortcut

  11. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  (General Feedback)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) shared this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) supported this idea  · 
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) shared this idea  · 
  13. 23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) supported this idea  · 
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) shared this idea  · 
  14. 366 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) supported this idea  · 
  15. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are looking into this. And as Samir mentioned, a workaround via SMA may apply to your scenario in the time being.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) commented  · 

    Even if i have suggested to use the SMA workaround, this still a workaround and even with my customer, we aborted the devlopment, because there is no clean way and it was very complicated. +3 to the suggestion

    Samir FARHAT (MVP) supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) commented  · 

    I think this is the number one priority for the WAP team. If they want that Service proviers opts for Windows Azure Pack, they have to offer Multi-Tier Service templates in the VM Role Gallery. We encountered a serious dilemma with a service provider when they discovered that WAP does not support multi-tier services. The workaround was through SMA but the method still limited and the way is "unclean"

  16. 444 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  20 comments  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) commented  · 

    This is a feature promised in Windows Server VNext, i doubt it will be implemented in the near update of azure

  17. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) commented  · 

    Yes, granular but a nice proposition

  18. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) commented  · 

    The Anti-Affinity is already automatically configured during VM Role instances deplomyment via the Availability Sets. The same instances under the same VM Role are configured with the same availability SetName. Yo can verify that on the VMM console, VM information.
    I don't think that two instances under the same role need an affinity set.
    Maybe Affinity will be implemented when Mult-tier VM Roles will be available.
    But the a check box still welcome.

  19. 76 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) commented  · 

    Yes online capabilities must be added. I think that because Microsoft Azure is using VHD format till now, the expand property is only shown when the VM is offline, since WAP is derived form Microsoft Azure (sharing the same code)

  20. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Samir FARHAT (MVP) commented  · 

    I think that this i the WAP roadmap already.

Feedback and Knowledge Base