Tim Pringle

My feedback

  1. 421 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Scripting and Command Line Tools » Powershell  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is a great idea. We are thinking about adding such functionality to the Portal. No confirmed plan yet. Thanks.

    Tim Pringle supported this idea  · 
  2. 43 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Automation » Webhooks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim Pringle commented  · 

    +1, would be a great.

  3. 37 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Just to confirm, you are looking for two additional frequencies: hour and minute. Our team can look into this.

    Yes – you can have a monitor/long running runbook that triggers other runbooks on a timer as a workaround for the moment.

    Tim Pringle commented  · 

    Hi Beth,

    Yes, hours and minutes would be a very nice to have in the product.

    cheers,

    Tim

    Tim Pringle shared this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Thanks for the feedback!
    For fonts – is this for the runbook authoring or through the experience in general?
    Also, the notifications bar is more for WAP in general as this is a general pattern.
    The SMA team can take a look at everything else.

    Also, you can currently use the dropdown to select different job statuses on both the runbooks list and the Runbook >Jobs list views.

    Tim Pringle commented  · 

    Hi Beth,

    re fonts, i think this is general authoring really.

    For the filtering, it was more if i want to do some type of additional criteria search. e.g. list jobs that have one of two statuses. At the moment it seems only possible to filter/search on one status at a time.

    Tim Pringle shared this idea  · 
  5. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim Pringle supported this idea  · 
  6. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Automation » Role Based Access Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Would role based access control solve this problem for you?

    Also, are you interested in protecting runbooks from being started or just edited and deleted?

    Thanks,
    Beth

    Tim Pringle commented  · 

    Hi Beth,

    We're pretty much interested in all levels of protection that could be offered. Execute, modify, run, create, delete, read only, publish would be all options that would be very handy. If these were available via role based access control, then that would be perfect. :-)

    cheers,

    Tim

    Tim Pringle shared this idea  · 
  7. 158 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Just to confirm the request, this is around having the complete SMA experience for tenants, correct? Should tenants be allowed to author their own runbooks? Or are you looking to have the admin provide runbook content for the tenants so that they can run and schedule approved runbooks?

    Tim Pringle commented  · 

    Publishing of runbooks to Plans by admins would be great, especially while there is no built in integration with Service Manager (though third parties can be used for this of course). This would fit in nicely with Agile development.

    Not so sure about allowing tenants to create their own runbooks though, could be a support nightmare for hosters / service providers.

  8. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim Pringle shared this idea  · 
  9. 384 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Security and Identity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Azure Pack Team responded

    Hi!

    Azure Stack as a product will support RBAC capabilities just like Azure. To clarify, it will not be coming as a feature in our in-market Azure Pack.

    Thank you,

    Kylie

    Tim Pringle supported this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Web Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim Pringle shared this idea  · 
  11. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim Pringle shared this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Can you provide a bit more detail about the scenario that you would want to use this for?

    Right now, you could change the purge schedule to occur more frequently if your db is filling up too quickly. You can also delete unneeded runbooks which would also delete the associated jobs.

    Tim Pringle commented  · 

    Hi Beth,

    The db size is fine, but I this would be handy for :

    When im having to go through a set of jobs via smacmdlets that are all of the same status, but some no longer relevant

    When im not interested in seeing a history record of a cmdlets jobs for e.g. because it has changed since it was last run and is likely to change several times before being used fully. If i've run a job 15 times yesterday, but the code has now changed and been updated whilst staying the same runbook, previous job info is more than likely not to be relevant information for me.

    More than anything, i'd like to option to choose if it's there or not, think waiting on a purge before it becomes removed isn't efficient.

    thanks,

    Tim

    Tim Pringle shared this idea  · 
  13. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Web Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim Pringle shared this idea  · 
  14. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Thanks for the feedback. We will look into this. In the meantime, you can use tags to help organize your runbooks.

    Tim Pringle shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base