Rudi Larno

My feedback

  1. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rudi Larno supported this idea  · 
  2. 349 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    42 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rudi Larno supported this idea  · 
  3. 45 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Thanks for your valuable feedback. Could you please share about your scenario which would help us to better understand the scope. We do have other feedback request from customers to ignore few parts with in SignalTraffic . https://feedback.azure.com/forums/357324-application-insights/suggestions/8395065-server-response-time-needs-to-ignore-signalr#{toggle_previous_statuses}.

    So want to better understand the two requirements and prioritize it accordingly with our existing feature backlog. Please share additional details on your scenario. Thank you

    Rudi Larno supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure SignalR Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rudi Larno shared this idea  · 
  5. 184 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  6 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rudi Larno supported this idea  · 
  6. 3,842 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    129 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Reopening this user voice item as our support for Skip/Take (Offset/Limit) was only limited to single partition queries.

    Update.

    The newly released .NET SDK v3 now includes support for x-partition queries using Offset/Limit. You can learn more about v3 SDK and try it and provide feedback on our github repo here.
    github.com/azure/azure-cosmos-dotnet-v3

    We will also be back-porting this functionality to our .NET v2 SDK. This work will begin shortly and we anticipate it to be released in September.

    Once that is released we will mark this feature as complete.

    Thank you for your patience and votes.

    Rudi Larno supported this idea  · 
  7. 4,183 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    88 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rudi Larno supported this idea  · 
  8. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Monitor-Application Insights » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rudi Larno shared this idea  · 
  9. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Monitor-Application Insights » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rudi Larno supported this idea  · 
  10. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  (General Feedback) » Offers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rudi Larno shared this idea  · 
  11. 427 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rudi Larno supported this idea  · 
    Rudi Larno commented  · 

    In the Management Portal, dates are shown in the US format AM/PM; not using a more internationally 24h format.

Feedback and Knowledge Base