Hans Vredevoort

My feedback

  1. 146 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Stack  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hans Vredevoort supported this idea  · 
  2. 212 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  ruturajd responded

    We are working to understand the requirements of this feature and deliver it. If you have any scenarios or examples that might help us take a decision kindly give a detailed comment below.

    Hans Vredevoort commented  · 

    We see many customers who implement 2-node SQL Clusters with FCI and Shared VHDX which cannot be protected with ASR. Fortunately SQL Server 2016 Standard edition allows for SQL AllwaysOn/Availability Groups which is compatible with ASR

    Hans Vredevoort commented  · 

    Over SMB

    Hans Vredevoort supported this idea  · 
    Hans Vredevoort commented  · 

    In almost every design for customers we use shared VHDX for guest clusters where shared storage is involved. Sometimes customers don't want to pay the premium of SQL Enterprise to benefit from SQL Server AlwaysOn Availability Groups and install SQL Server FCI which requires shared storage. File Server guest clusters require shared storage. Shared VHDX is really important for us to be used with ASR

    Hans Vredevoort commented  · 

    With support for Shared VHDX in Azure this would make WSFC in Azure a great additional service. Customers often do not have Enterprise licenses to make Availability Groups work.

  3. 7,864 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    201 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hans Vredevoort supported this idea  · 
  4. 195 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Azure Backup » Azure Stack  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hans Vredevoort supported this idea  · 
  5. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Backup » MARS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hans Vredevoort shared this idea  · 
  6. 48 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Azure Backup » MARS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hans Vredevoort commented  · 

    Isn't this already possible? If I'm not mistaken we are already using this.

  7. 158 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Just to confirm the request, this is around having the complete SMA experience for tenants, correct? Should tenants be allowed to author their own runbooks? Or are you looking to have the admin provide runbook content for the tenants so that they can run and schedule approved runbooks?

    Hans Vredevoort commented  · 

    If you could leave that optional, we would have best of both worlds. A controlled offering of tenant runbooks is just as valuable as a tenant controlled use of runbooks. Thanks for responding!

  8. 84 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hans Vredevoort supported this idea  · 
  9. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Setup and Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hans Vredevoort supported this idea  · 
  10. 94 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Portal and API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Azure Pack Team responded

    Hi-

    We are planning for Azure Stack as a product to include service health monitoring of this sort.

    Thank you,

    Kylie

    Hans Vredevoort shared this idea  · 
  11. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Pack » Portal and API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback! We too would love to bring this Azure-consistent functionality on-premise.

    Hans Vredevoort shared this idea  · 
  12. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hans Vredevoort shared this idea  · 
  13. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hans Vredevoort shared this idea  · 
  14. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hans Vredevoort shared this idea  · 
  15. 406 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hans Vredevoort supported this idea  · 
  16. 230 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Azure Pack » IAAS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are reviewing a feature for disaster recovery for VMs. If you have particular ideas about the feature, please share with us here. Note that disaster recovery and backup/recovery are different features.

    Hans Vredevoort supported this idea  · 
    Hans Vredevoort shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base