Benjamin Talmard

My feedback

  1. 46 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Sphere  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  2. 29 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Marketplace » Feature Request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  3. 2,717 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    165 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Quick update,

    We have been considering all of the risks and investigating the steps required to ensure we implement this feature with high positive impact and low to no negative impact.

    After this investigation we have decided we will enable Pay-As-You-Go customers the option to configure a spending limit on a Pay-As-You-Go subscription, with appropriate safeguards and measures to prevent both service abuse and production service failure.

    We have not yet finished determining the details of what this feature will look like, nor do we have a timeline for release, but we have heard your voices and have added this feature to our backlog.

    Thanks for your continued feedback,

    -Adam (Azure Billing Team)

    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  4. 243 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  5. 142 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  2 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  6. 113 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  7. 95 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  8. 183 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  7 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  9. 195 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  12 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  10. 607 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    62 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  11. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) » Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  12. 2,591 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    61 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  13. 216 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  14. 98 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  2 comments  ·  CDN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  15. 91 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  CDN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Anton Kucer [MSFT] responded

    Azure CDN by default ignores Vary header except when it is used with Vary: accept-encoding. This is done as the Vary header can easily cause serious cache bloat issues. Long term we are targeting feature to allow users to easily adjust this default behavior.

    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  16. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  CDN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard shared this idea  · 
  17. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  18. 305 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  12 comments  ·  Azure Backup » Retention and Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  19. 1,070 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    26 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We view this ask as a set of related features.

    Soft delete for blobs enables you to save and recover your data where blobs or blob snapshots are deleted. It does not protect against container or account deletion. This feature is currently generally available. You can see the announcement here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/soft-delete-for-azure-storage-blobs-ga/ and the full documentation here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/blobs/storage-blob-soft-delete

    Object versioning will also offer object-level protection, and will offer a few incremental improvements to soft delete. Specifically, it will make recovery of deleted data easier. This feature is planned for the coming year.

    Container soft delete will protect against container-level deletion and modification. This feature is planned for the coming year as well.

    Native support for blob backup will protect against account-level deletion and modification, and is currently on our backlog.

    We will provide updates when they become available. For any further questions, or to discuss your…

    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
  20. 1,226 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    31 comments  ·  Azure Search » Pricing and Quotas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Benjamin Talmard supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base