Graham Bunce

My feedback

  1. 828 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  49 comments  ·  Notification Hubs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graham Bunce commented  · 

    The question could be asked if this still appropriate now Microsoft have released Azure SignalR that supposedly handles scale, servers etc. automatically and supports websockets?

    However, since hubs can be used to push to multiple mobile devices (iOS/Android) having a separate SignalR backbone just for web would be annoying. Therefore I can see a need for hubs to push to any consumer using the most efficient channel possible - in the case of web this would be WebSockets.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graham Bunce commented  · 

    I think the advantage of this would be one API for our applications to use, instead of Azure notification hubs for mobile devices and a separate self-hosted SignalR for websites when they basically solve the same problem but for different targets.

    In effect notification hubs could host their own internal SignalR backbone for us to hook into.

  2. 243 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graham Bunce commented  · 

    presumably the same Microsoft idiots who thought it would be a good idea to use the "string" name for a project in TFS as the unique ID, so we couldn't rename projects for years, designed this so that the name of the alert is actually part of the unique key in their database..... otherwise what's the problem in getting this done?

    Graham Bunce supported this idea  · 
  3. 150 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graham Bunce supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,593 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    41 comments  ·  Azure Search » Pricing and Quotas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graham Bunce commented  · 

    So... "considering it" usually means "it's kicked to the long grass never to return." Give us some dates. Are we 6 months, 12 months, 2 years away? Architecture changes needed? Why is this not feasible to do?

    Graham Bunce supported this idea  · 
  5. 110 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Azure portal » Dashboards + tiles  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graham Bunce supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graham Bunce commented  · 

    WTF? Less of the "this would be awesome" by the admins, and more "yes, we think that's a good idea, it's scheduled for release in XX months"

  6. 38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Azure portal » Dashboards + tiles  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graham Bunce commented  · 

    I'm not at all sure what value the markdown title has. Every example I've seen is "add some upcoming events to your dashboard"... woop-de-woo... how pointless is that?

    If we want to build something like Hystrix, with more appropriate advanced monitoring directly in our dashboard alongside the Azure titles, how do we do that?

    Looks like we can't.

    A basic title that renders HTML and that you can either force refresh (polling) or enable a webhook that needs to be called to update the tile would be an acceptable solution.

    Graham Bunce supported this idea  · 
  7. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graham Bunce commented  · 

    Under review since 2015. Any chance of this being improved before the heat death of the universe? Especially since this is a killer for cross-partition queries.

    My example, (PK = z or PK =y OR PK = z) and RK = 123 is so slow it must be performing a table scan.

  8. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Search » Indexing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graham Bunce commented  · 

    We gave up on the indexer. Far too slow and far to expensive to scale and updated content ourselves via the api. More pain to write, but far superior performance.

  9. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Search » Indexing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graham Bunce shared this idea  · 
  10. 106 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graham Bunce commented  · 

    Agreed, getting the same problem. No help, no nothing. This was working fine around a month ago. BTW, after an update it works in VS2017 and Azure Explorer but not VS2015... what on earth have you guys borked???

    Graham Bunce supported this idea  · 
  12. 107 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Cache » Azure Redis Cache  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graham Bunce supported this idea  · 
  13. 430 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graham Bunce supported this idea  · 
  14. 809 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Azure Search » Indexing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graham Bunce supported this idea  · 
  15. 97 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Search » Indexing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. 148 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. 209 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. 692 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. 1,305 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    22 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We recently released support for client-side transactions in our .NET SDK.

    https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cosmosdb/introducing-transactionalbatch-in-the-net-sdk/

    We would like to get your feedback on this to understand if this meets your needs for transaction support. Please read our announcement and/or feel free to try our new support then please respond to this one question survey.

    https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=v4j5cvGGr0GRqy180BHbR_Lrg0nxRBtErN-GyphxUs9UQ0c1STlJTDVOT1JXUzhYVkYzU1JZSU5BTi4u

    Thank you.

  20. 63 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graham Bunce supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base