Stefan de Kooter

My feedback

  1. 59 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan de Kooter supported this idea  · 
  2. 2,257 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    122 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stefan de Kooter commented  · 

    Gateway run hours should not be a separate cost besides the data transfer/connected hours. Since a GW can be deployed multi-tenant there shouldn't be a tenant -specific cost. When running a normal VM we don't pay separately for a hypervisor as well but only for the usage of the resource.
    So make the GW a shared resource, come up with a data transfer rate that covers the cost and scale that thing! offcourse the same goes for P2S VPNs. VPNaaS, not GW-VM-aaS.

    Stefan de Kooter supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base