Stefan de Kooter
My feedback
-
59 votesStefan de Kooter
supported this idea
·
-
2,257 votes
We’ve moved this ask to the backlog due to technical challenges in reserving Public IP addresses during stop state.
An error occurred while saving the comment Stefan de Kooter
supported this idea
·
Gateway run hours should not be a separate cost besides the data transfer/connected hours. Since a GW can be deployed multi-tenant there shouldn't be a tenant -specific cost. When running a normal VM we don't pay separately for a hypervisor as well but only for the usage of the resource.
So make the GW a shared resource, come up with a data transfer rate that covers the cost and scale that thing! offcourse the same goes for P2S VPNs. VPNaaS, not GW-VM-aaS.