GG

My feedback

  1. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure IoT Edge » Deploying modules  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GG commented  · 

    IoT-Edge Azure Functions are also limited to 20? That is probably too few and in contrast to the azure-functions purpose and design: lots of small functions carrying out independent tasks. But the real advantage here is that does enable any number of concurrent instances of a module to exist if it is really Azure Functions.

  2. 712 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    29 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GG commented  · 

    Give us a schedule for this show-stopper feature please.

    GG supported this idea  · 
  3. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Container Instances  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GG supported this idea  · 
    GG commented  · 

    The --cap-add is required for features such as blobfuse. AzureFiles is the wrong solution for many scenarios. Add this capability, or don't wonder why we use AWS: we have to, since it don't work in ACI!

    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/azure/en-US/20b5c3f8-f849-4da2-92d9-374a37e6f446/addremove-linux-capabilities-for-docker-container?forum=WAVirtualMachinesforWindows

  4. 47 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  4 comments  ·  Azure IoT Edge » Installing IoT Edge runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GG supported this idea  · 
  5. 49 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure IoT Edge » Installing IoT Edge runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GG supported this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GG shared this idea  · 
  7. 291 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Gremlin API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GG supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,019 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GG commented  · 

    Is there already a way to see current usage in terms of total data sizes? This is needed if only for accounting reasons...

  9. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GG commented  · 

    Journaling OK, but what one needs to be able to debug and analyse svc bus problems is more like the trace levels providec by nlog or log4net. The svc bus user could simple provide an azure table storage name and set the desired "vervosity" level to trace every aspect of messages including things like "were all the messages that I put on the bus picked up" and how many messages did I put on the bus in the last 10 min...

    GG supported this idea  · 
  10. 65 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GG shared this idea  · 
  11. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Availability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Guy Burstein responded

    Windows Azure is commercially available in the following 84 countries, and this is not one of them. Learn more here: http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/pricing/faq/

    We are adding more countries as we can, but in the meantime if you wish to use the service in an unsupported country, you’ll need to use one of several third party providers which front the Azure Subscriptions for organizations in unsupported countries. Just keep in mind that those providers are not MSFT so perform due-diligence to make sure any vendor you select is reputable.

    Thanks for understanding.

    GG supported this idea  · 
  12. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GG supported this idea  · 
  13. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is a very interesting idea and one I like a lot! Let me dig into whether this is something we could consider in the future. Thanks for the idea! :)

    GG supported this idea  · 
  14. 143 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    started  ·  Guy Burstein responded

    We keep updating out pricing rates and models to better align with our customers business needs.

    GG supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base