Mikael Guldborg Rask Andersen

My feedback

  1. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mikael Guldborg Rask Andersen supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mikael Guldborg Rask Andersen commented  · 

    This would essentially be equivalent of implementing the Reverse() linq function, and I agree that it would help a lot of scenarios. I am using Table Storage it to implement a time series storage, and it would be a great help for me.

    It should also much more doable than a generic OrderBy implementation, that may not even be feasible.

  2. 124 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mikael Guldborg Rask Andersen commented  · 

    I would really like to see this feature be supported as well. When you insert or retrieve a large amount of data from table storage the overhead in the HTTP protocol is just massive. Especially when you compare to extremely efficient alternatives such as MongoDB.

    Please give a super-efficient alternative to HTTP OData!

    Mikael Guldborg Rask Andersen supported this idea  · 
  3. 32 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mikael Guldborg Rask Andersen supported this idea  · 
    Mikael Guldborg Rask Andersen shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base