Ognyan Dimitrov

My feedback

  1. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Monitor-Application Insights » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  2. 245 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    44 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you. We will examine the experience of duplicate sign ups across Identity providers. Would performing this check by using the email address be sufficient?

    BTW, Linking multiple provider accounts to one user is in our roadmap and we’ve already achieved it in preview…

    We look forward to your feedback

    /Jose Rojas

    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Signup and Billing » Subscription management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ognyan Dimitrov commented  · 

    Additionally you can find here https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/app-service-managed-service-identity

    a note saying the same thing regarding Azure Functions with managed identity in AD (If I am not totally wrong) :

    Managed identities for App Service and Azure Functions will not behave as expected if your app is migrated across subscriptions/tenants. The app will need to obtain a new identity, which can be done by disabling and re-enabling the feature. See Removing an identity below. Downstream resources will also need to have access policies updated to use the new identity.

    Ognyan Dimitrov shared this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Reservations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  5. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  6. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  7. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure portal » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ognyan Dimitrov shared this idea  · 
  8. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We are currently working on providing this functionality and will provide updates when they become available. See the following article for the latest: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/status-and-error-codes2. Note that for REST API version 2017-07-29 and later, failed API operations also return the storage error code string in a response header. For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ognyan Dimitrov commented  · 

    Yeah! When I see : 'The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error.'
    I do not get excited about debugging it.

  9. 23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ognyan Dimitrov commented  · 

    Come On! Do it! You can do it! :)
    : 'The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error.'
    Aaaargh!

  10. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Storage » Storage Emulator  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ognyan Dimitrov commented  · 
    Ognyan Dimitrov shared this idea  · 
  11. 1,334 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    38 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of blob storage lifecycle management. The feature set offers a rich, rule-based policy engine which you can use to transition your data to the best access tier and to expire data at the end of its lifecycle. See our post on the Azure Blog to get started: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-blob-storage-lifecycle-management-public-preview/preview/.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at DLMFeedback@microsoft.com.

    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  12. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  13. 1,034 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    35 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Our apologies for not updating this ask earlier. Renaming Blobs is on our backlog, but is unlikely to be released in the coming year. Today, you can use the “Copy Blob” API as a workaround.

    Using the Azure Files service you can address Azure Storage like a network share using the SMB2.1 protocol.  This enables usage of normal Windows API’s to rename files and directories.  You can get started with the Files service by visiting https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-dotnet-how-to-use-files.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  14. 167 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    41 comments  ·  Azure portal » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey folks,

    It’s been a while since I’ve updated this space.

    Performance is a high priority for all new and existing feature in the Azure Portal, and we’re constantly assessing all experiences to ensure they meet your expectations.

    If anyone experiences any specific Portal performance issues please feel free to open new items, reach out to myself directly (sewatson@microsoft.com), or leave comments for those scenarios. We’d happily investigate them further.

    Cheers,
    Sean.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ognyan Dimitrov commented  · 

    I suppose that placing a node of the web instance or just a caching node in every country will do the job just fine.

    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  15. 245 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ognyan Dimitrov commented  · 

    @Gelande Strasse are you looking for this - https://snag.gy/faJlsV.jpg
    Looks like it is implemented

    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  16. 5,073 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    127 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  17. 165 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Cache » Azure Redis Cache  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ognyan Dimitrov shared this idea  · 
  18. 162 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  19. 718 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  115 comments  ·  Azure portal » Search + navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
  20. 998 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    50 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Ognyan Dimitrov supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base