At this point our recommendation is to move resources into a new Resource Group with the new name.
Unplanned, but not rejected, there's still hope...maybe in another 5 years we'll get some traction on this.
Unfortunately, we have no plans for data residency in Australia. If this is key to your needs please continue voting and we will use this to help us prioritize this in the future.
Just pinging that this is still the proper status for this feature request.
What is the real status of this? The linked GitHub issue is closed but this feedback item is only planned.
You can remove directories by contacting the organization that owns the directory and asking them to remove you.
We can add the ability to hide them, if this is a popular request.
We continue evaluating several alternatives to provide full email customization. We are actively working on an alternative.
Unfortunately we do no yet have an ETA.
Thank you for your feedback. We’re considering this for a future release of Azure Search.
Azure Search Product Team
Alan, if I understand correctly, you are saying you cannot see the converged apps you registered on apps.dev.microsoft.com in the Azure Portal. Converged apps cannot currently be managed in the Azure Portal, even though they are registered in the Azure AD tenant listed in the message. If you would like to manage converged apps in the Azure Portal, please post that as an idea/suggestion or vote for it once the post exists.
Yes of course I see the application in apps.dev.microsoft.com/#/appList, but the message I gave is shown at the top of the application page and I can't find it anywhere in Azure AD.
Thanks for your suggestion! The feature is currently in our backlog, but has to be prioritized with other ones. So we don’t have an ETA at this point of time. Please don’t hesitate to vote for it if you want to see it’s done sooner.
We plan to add the auto-start to the regular Compute blade at some point. However, if you create the VMs in a Lab, the auto-start is already available.
Also, we do de-allocate.
Thanks for the input!
Good feedback. No plans in this area, yet.
19 votesunder review · AdminAzure IaaS Engineering Team (Azure IaaS Engineering Team, Microsoft, Microsoft Azure) responded
Great feedback, thanks! We don’t have any plans to support this yet, but we’ll look into in the future.
Uservoice admins, please combine the votes from this post to the one Michael links to in the comments.
41 votes3 comments · Networking » Domain Name Service (DNS, Traffic Manager) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We included formalizing the Traffic Manager user agent string in our roadmap.
We are likely to support this in phases. Stay tuned for more details.
Please provide an update on support for this.
Thanks for the feedback, Alan. I am guessing your feedback is more around improving the performance of the VM creation rather than the functionality, correct? I ask because the functionality already exists today.
Just so that you are aware, this forum is for Cloud Services. We also have a Virtual Machines community (http://feedback.windowsazure.com/forums/216843-virtual-machines) where you can find answers to all Virtual Machine related questions.
71 votesunder review · 1 comment · Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Good feedback. We’ll take a look at making PS scripts first-class citizens.