David Ludwig

My feedback

  1. 340 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David Ludwig commented  · 

    Hélder Pinto, I find your link interesting from a technical perspective, however, presuming that Microsoft is backing their servers off non-Apple hardware, it would be against Apple's licensing restrictions for macOS. That legal-issue, alone, would prevent me, and I imagine many others, from relying on it in a production environment.

    David Ludwig commented  · 

    To be clear, such a feature should, ideally, extend to newer versions of macOS, ones that no longer carry the "X" in their name (and are just called, "macOS", by Apple). :-)

    David Ludwig commented  · 

    A similar, UserVoice-requested feature (for Mac VMs) is also at https://feedback.azure.com/forums/34192--general-feedback/suggestions/6655478-provide-a-way-to-run-mac-based-remote-build-agents . It appears limited to build-agent use, though.

    David Ludwig commented  · 

    Alternatively, if this were made available, and a larger cost were necessary (as is the case with many Azure VM types) in order to cover costs of Apple hardware, that'd be fine. Regarding "Azure pricing", the thought there is to make OS X VMs available through one billing provider (Azure).

    David Ludwig shared this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David Ludwig commented  · 

    The lack of such a feature is one of the reasons I am likely to use a password vault from a different company that does provide this, such as https://1password.com

    David Ludwig supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David Ludwig supported this idea  · 
    David Ludwig commented  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David Ludwig supported this idea  · 
    David Ludwig commented  · 
  5. 3,013 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    125 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi everyone,

    We recently announce the General Availability of Azure Active Directory Domain Services (Azure AD DS) authentication for Azure Files! By enabling integration with Azure AD DS, you can mount your Azure file share over SMB using Azure AD credentials from Azure AD DS domain joined Windows VMs with NTFS ACLs enforced. For more details, please refer to our blog post:http://aka.ms/azure-file-aadds-authentication-ga-blog.

    A part of the GA announcement, we shared the upcoming plan to extend the authentication support to Active Directory (AD) either hosted on-premises or in cloud. If you need an Azure Files solution with AD authentication today, you can consider installing Azure File Sync (AFS) on your Windows File Servers where AD integration is fully supported.

    If you are interested to hear future updates on Azure Files Active Directory Authentication, please complete this sign-up survey:https://aka.ms/AzureFilesADAuthPreviewSurvey.

    Thanks,
    Azure Files Team

    David Ludwig commented  · 

    There appears to be a similar, vote-able request for this, at https://feedback.azure.com/forums/217298-storage/suggestions/6078420-acl-s-for-azurefiles . It does not reference ACLs with filtering based source-IP-address, but rather with Active Directory accounts, so perhaps it is insufficient, however it is marked as "Under Review".

    David Ludwig supported this idea  · 
  6. 30 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David Ludwig commented  · 

    FYI, there is another, UserVoice-hosted request for Mac VMs at https://feedback.azure.com/forums/216843-virtual-machines/suggestions/13826655-mac-os-x-virtual-machines . Votes there would be welcomed. ;-)

    David Ludwig supported this idea  · 
  7. 4,650 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    144 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.

    Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    David Ludwig supported this idea  · 
  8. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David Ludwig supported this idea  · 
  9. 984 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    48 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    David Ludwig supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base