David Ludwig
My feedback
-
413 votesunplanned ·
AdminAzure IaaS Engineering Team
(Azure IaaS Engineering Team, Microsoft, Microsoft Azure)
responded
This is not something that we have on our roadmap. It is something that we may consider in the future.
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment To be clear, such a feature should, ideally, extend to newer versions of macOS, ones that no longer carry the "X" in their name (and are just called, "macOS", by Apple). :-)
An error occurred while saving the comment A similar, UserVoice-requested feature (for Mac VMs) is also at https://feedback.azure.com/forums/34192--general-feedback/suggestions/6655478-provide-a-way-to-run-mac-based-remote-build-agents . It appears limited to build-agent use, though.
An error occurred while saving the comment Alternatively, if this were made available, and a larger cost were necessary (as is the case with many Azure VM types) in order to cover costs of Apple hardware, that'd be fine. Regarding "Azure pricing", the thought there is to make OS X VMs available through one billing provider (Azure).
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment The lack of such a feature is one of the reasons I am likely to use a password vault from a different company that does provide this, such as https://1password.com
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment A similar, UserVoice-requested feature (for Mac VMs) is also at https://feedback.azure.com/forums/34192--general-feedback/suggestions/6655478-provide-a-way-to-run-mac-based-remote-build-agents .
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment A similar, UserVoice-requested feature (for Mac VMs) is also at https://feedback.azure.com/forums/34192--general-feedback/suggestions/6655478-provide-a-way-to-run-mac-based-remote-build-agents .
-
32 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FYI, there is another, UserVoice-hosted request for Mac VMs at https://feedback.azure.com/forums/216843-virtual-machines/suggestions/13826655-mac-os-x-virtual-machines . Votes there would be welcomed. ;-)
-
5,057 votes
Thank you for the continued feedback on this request. We’re evaluating this support in the context of various storage services and connectivity mechanisms.
-
26 votesunder review ·AdminAzure IaaS Engineering Team
(Azure IaaS Engineering Team, Microsoft, Microsoft Azure)
responded
We continue to look to providing additional OS variations.
-
1,004 votes
Hey Folks,
We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.
We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.
Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.
Thanks,
Azure Portal Team
Hélder Pinto, I find your link interesting from a technical perspective, however, presuming that Microsoft is backing their servers off non-Apple hardware, it would be against Apple's licensing restrictions for macOS. That legal-issue, alone, would prevent me, and I imagine many others, from relying on it in a production environment.