Rodrigo Fonseca

My feedback

  1. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rodrigo Fonseca shared this idea  · 
  2. 105 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) » CLI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  3. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Backup » Retention and Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rodrigo Fonseca commented  · 

    I have a scenario where a financial customer has a requirement that all their backups are WORM compliant.
    I understand that we have this feature on blob storage (immutable storage) but when we use Azure Backup we don't have this option. When this feature will be available?

    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  4. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  5. 79 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  6. 353 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    51 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Domain Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    UPDATE 01/06/2020
    Multiple scenarios are still being investigated.
    (We changed the status to because Started implied we were working on the feature and we did not want to represent it inaccurately. We are investigating and therefore, we are marking it under review.

    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  7. 886 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    79 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  8. 157 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  9. 150 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    There is no plan currently to offer these system level metrics for Application Gateway Standard (V1). However, we are planning to offer more observability with our new Autoscaling version (V2) of Application Gateway/WAF. We already offer Capacity Units as a metric which gives you a sense of the traffic load on your Application Gateway. More are planned for V2. Please send in your specific feedback via https://aka.ms/ApplicationGatewayCohort

    Rodrigo Fonseca shared this idea  · 
  10. 50 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Azure AD Connect Health  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  11. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rodrigo Fonseca shared this idea  · 
  12. 33 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rodrigo Fonseca commented  · 

    Q. Are Network Security Groups supported on the Application Gateway subnet?
    Network Security Groups are supported on the Application Gateway subnet with the following restrictions:
    Exceptions must be put in for incoming traffic on ports 65503-65534 for backend health to work correctly.
    Outbound internet connectivity can't be blocked.
    Traffic from the AzureLoadBalancer tag must be allowed.

  13. 637 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  14. 50 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Backup  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Azure Cloud Shell » PowerShell  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  16. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  17. 1,242 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  18. 72 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Storage » Managed Disk Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
  19. 112 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. 1,131 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Rodrigo Fonseca supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base