Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 208 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  34 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Domain Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 630 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    64 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 151 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 138 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    There is no plan currently to offer these system level metrics for Application Gateway Standard (V1). However, we are planning to offer more observability with our new Autoscaling version (V2) of Application Gateway/WAF. We already offer Capacity Units as a metric which gives you a sense of the traffic load on your Application Gateway. More are planned for V2. Please send in your specific feedback via https://aka.ms/ApplicationGatewayCohort

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  5. 40 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Azure AD Connect Health  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  7. 33 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Availability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Q. Are Network Security Groups supported on the Application Gateway subnet?
    Network Security Groups are supported on the Application Gateway subnet with the following restrictions:
    Exceptions must be put in for incoming traffic on ports 65503-65534 for backend health to work correctly.
    Outbound internet connectivity can't be blocked.
    Traffic from the AzureLoadBalancer tag must be allowed.

  8. 357 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 50 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Backup  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Azure Cloud Shell » PowerShell  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 813 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 76 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Storage » Managed Disk Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 87 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. 1,099 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 984 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    49 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 234 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Conditional Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 127 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Include new metrics like:
    App GW Requests per second
    App GW Latency to the backend
    APP GW Queue (if there's throttling)

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 49 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The portal uses cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) to communicate to back-end services directly from the browser. We are working with our partner teams to get a full list of URLs required to manage your resources in the portal. Here are a few known URLs:

    *.azure.com
    *.azure.net
    *.windows.net
    *.azurecomcdn.net
    *.azureedge.net
    *.msecnd.net
    login.microsoftonline.com
    login.live.com

    Third-party services:

    *.sendgrid.com
    *.newrelic.com

    Please let us know if we missed any.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base