Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Mike Binnix

My feedback

  1. 58 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Binnix supported this idea  · 
  2. 6,495 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    260 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Binnix supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,513 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    100 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi folks,

    We are evaluating what we can do to address this feedback and would very much appreciate your continued votes and suggestions on it.

    One alternative to mounting the share on-premises over port 445 is Azure File Sync, which enables you to create a cache of an Azure file share on an on-premises Windows Server. Azure File Sync only sends data over the Azure Files HTTPS (using the File REST APIs). You can learn more about Azure File Sync here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/files/storage-sync-files-planning

    Please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any additional questions!

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Mike Binnix supported this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Binnix shared this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mike Binnix commented  · 

    This must be a high priority. We had an even more extreme example where customer service reported a systemic network failure in both US East2 and UK South. We could not start or provision any VMs for a 29 hour period during the service impact. BUT THE EVENT WAS NEVER REPORTED ON THE PORTAL SERIVCE HEALTH for US East2. NEVER MENTIONED. I find this an unacceptable omission in the process for managing system outages. The lack of communication is worse than the service disruption itself.

    Mike Binnix supported this idea  · 
  6. 436 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mike Binnix commented  · 

    Would be very helpful even just for testing web apps so we can verify appearance performance in the safari browser on macOS.

    Mike Binnix supported this idea  · 
  7. 134 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Binnix supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base