Gonzalo Parra

My feedback

  1. 2,800 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    114 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi folks,

    We have shipped a public preview of integration with AAD DS: https://azure.microsoft.com/blog/azure-active-directory-integration-for-smb-access-now-in-public-preview/

    What we have in preview is a first step along a much larger roadmap for integration with AAD/AD for authentication and authorization. As the blog post says, this initial preview is really about Windows cloud VM access to the Azure file share with an AAD identity. Future refreshes to this feature will add non-Windows (Linux, macOS, etc) support, and the ability to mount the Azure file shares on-premises with your AAD identity. You can learn more about this in our Ignite session as well (at around 22:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMzh2M66E9o

    We’ll keep you updated on our progress. In the meantime, don’t hesitate to continue posting feedback on this feature below.

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Gonzalo Parra supported this idea  · 
  2. 226 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gonzalo Parra commented  · 

    This is an important requirement so we can have control over the RTO, otherwise its a big question mark...

  3. 210 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  ruturajd responded

    We are working to understand the requirements of this feature and deliver it. If you have any scenarios or examples that might help us take a decision kindly give a detailed comment below.

    Gonzalo Parra supported this idea  · 
  4. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gonzalo Parra supported this idea  · 
  5. 152 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  13 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gonzalo Parra supported this idea  · 
  6. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gonzalo Parra commented  · 

    This would be really useful.

    We have to publish our static IPs for our customers to be able to allow access on their firewalls. Right now its all over the place and they need to add a bunch of IP addresses to their rules. It would be great if we could just reserve (and pay for) a range of contiguous public IPs to be allocated as we need among our services / VMs and only a single range of IPs to our customers...

    Gonzalo Parra supported this idea  · 
  7. 77 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Gonzalo Parra supported this idea  · 
  8. 850 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thanks you for the suggestion. This remains a key backlog item for us.

    We’d be interested in further input via your comments. Please consider the following questions:
    – Do you require zone transfers in to Azure DNS, or zone transfers out? Why?
    – Do you require AXFR or IXFR?
    – How should zone transfers be secured?

    Gonzalo Parra commented  · 

    Agree with this, allowing zone transfers so Azure DNS can be used as secondary DNS service for split brain DNS configurations would be really useful.

    Gonzalo Parra supported this idea  · 
  9. 94 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gonzalo Parra supported this idea  · 
  10. 131 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gonzalo Parra supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,893 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    168 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey folks, sorry for the late update. Some backend changes were made to alleviate this issue but I believe it doesn’t solve it for everyone yet. Let me go get some details and come back with a better update. Thanks!

    John

    Gonzalo Parra shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base