39 votes3 comments · Networking » Security (ACLs, Firewalls, Intrusion Detection) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We have started to work on ICMP support for NSGs.
- Anavi N [MSFT]
We are working to support ICMP on NSGs.
- Anavi N [MSFT]
38 votesunder review · AdminSQL Database feature voting forum admins (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure) responded
Thanks for bringing this up. We currently don’t have plans for MSDTC support yet.
Can you please let us know more about your scenario and how much effort it would take to re-write your application, how big of a blocker it is?
Implementing MSDTC support in cloud environment is not a trivial ask. We need to make sure that there is a demand for this and it has higher priority than other features.
We have raised the limit to 100 recently. We are regularly reviewing the limits and will continue to look for opportunities to raise the limits even further. If you have scenarios requiring limits higher than what is supported, please add your scenario details here (if you are comfortable with that) or raise an issue with Azure support and we will get back to you.
We host 100's of sites and having such a low limit makes this service practically useless, the limit needs to be exponentially higher, in the 1000's for it to be really useful. Not sure if this would require a separate idea but allowing multiple host names (unlimited or very high limit) per listener would really help, wildcards solves the problem for some cases but not most.
Also, if the problem is performance related, how come the limit is fixed and not size dependent? shouldn't the Large AG be able to handle a lot more than the Medium or Small?
Thank you for all the votes and feedback. We have started work on this and the capability will be supported soon. If you would like to get in touch with us to discuss your scenarios, please fill this form: https://aka.ms/ApplicationGatewayCohort
We have shipped a public preview of integration with AAD DS: https://azure.microsoft.com/blog/azure-active-directory-integration-for-smb-access-now-in-public-preview/
What we have in preview is a first step along a much larger roadmap for integration with AAD/AD for authentication and authorization. As the blog post says, this initial preview is really about Windows cloud VM access to the Azure file share with an AAD identity. Future refreshes to this feature will add non-Windows (Linux, macOS, etc) support, and the ability to mount the Azure file shares on-premises with your AAD identity. You can learn more about this in our Ignite session as well (at around 22:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMzh2M66E9o
We’ll keep you updated on our progress. In the meantime, don’t hesitate to continue posting feedback on this feature below.
Program Manager, Azure Files
Thank you for your feedback. We are working on customer controlled failover for both disaster and DR drill scenarios. Please contact email@example.com for more details about enrolling in a private preview, and for any further questions.
This is an important requirement so we can have control over the RTO, otherwise its a big question mark...
We are working to understand the requirements of this feature and deliver it. If you have any scenarios or examples that might help us take a decision kindly give a detailed comment below.
14 votesunder review · AdminAzure IaaS Engineering Team (Azure IaaS Engineering Team, Microsoft, Microsoft Azure) responded
This is a nice feature. We are looking into it. In the interim, please check out Azure Files as a workaround using an SMB file share.
This would be really useful.
We have to publish our static IPs for our customers to be able to allow access on their firewalls. Right now its all over the place and they need to add a bunch of IP addresses to their rules. It would be great if we could just reserve (and pay for) a range of contiguous public IPs to be allocated as we need among our services / VMs and only a single range of IPs to our customers...
77 votes2 comments · Networking » VPN Connectivity (Point-to-Site, Site-to-Site) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thanks for the feedback. We do plan to improve the performance and scale of Azure VPN gateways. We will provide more updates once we have concrete plans and measurements.
898 votes47 comments · Networking » Domain Name Service (DNS, Traffic Manager) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Zone transfer is on our roadmap however not planned for CY 2019.
Agree with this, allowing zone transfers so Azure DNS can be used as secondary DNS service for split brain DNS configurations would be really useful.
Azure has this capability already with EA & CSP. We would like to offer this for Web direct customers as well.
-Matt (Azure Billing)
We appreciate your feedback.
We have planned a feature to provide a PDF summary statement of your Marketplace Charges on a monthly basis. Timing is currently TBD.
Azure Billing Team
Hey folks, sorry for the late update. Some backend changes were made to alleviate this issue but I believe it doesn’t solve it for everyone yet. Let me go get some details and come back with a better update. Thanks!
JohnGonzalo Parra shared this idea ·