Mark

My feedback

  1. 164 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  8 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark commented  · 

    Useful for testing. Current auto pausing means having to wait an hour between testing my retry logic and make sure no other devs hit the database. I could mock it but useful to have a real test for integration testing.

    Any ideas when this capability may go into preview or release?

    Mark supported this idea  · 
  2. 37 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark commented  · 

    This completely breaks CICD and unexpectedly as the code is finished and we are implementing the CICD - this was not a welcome surprise. Hard to see a way to override this other than some hacky code to overwrite the deployment afterwards.

    PLEASE don't add any more linked services without parameters for important values.

    Mark supported this idea  · 
  3. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark shared this idea  · 
  4. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Admin Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark commented  · 

    If this can protect from cyclical ownership, this would help us. It enables us to have an operations group who can all manage aspects of the group without having to give them a more powerful directory role. Oterwise, create a role action that purely enables group management (create/delete/update type operations) so we can assign that role a group for AD.

    Mark supported this idea  · 
  5. 73 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark commented  · 

    SQL DWH scale rest API requires PATCH. We'd like to scale up before a pipeline run then scale back down afterwards. I have to work around this with an Azure function or a logic app which is more code to maintain. Would be much easier if you can simply support PATCH as an option.

  6. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark commented  · 

    Much needed feature when sequential is selected. We select sequential for a good reason...because they are an ordered set of activities which means we need to stop if a previous activity fails.

  7. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark shared this idea  · 
  8. 600 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark commented  · 

    I need this too for an IF activity. I get how a specific activity could do this but your "better still" comment, not sure how this would be implemented because there are 4 possible scenarios.

    The activity generated and error and do we throw or not throw.
    The activity generated no error and do we throw or not throw..

    My 2c would say have an activity whose only job is to create an error output (the red pill :-) ). This can be placed anywhere but especially useful in an IF activity on either the true or false branch.

  9. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark shared this idea  · 
  10. 233 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark supported this idea  · 
  11. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base