Yes, this is absolutely needed.
We have a team that own many applications and groups. To allow all team members to maintain their objects, and for admins to see who owns it, we currently have to add each user one by one on each app, SP and group. And when a team member changes, we have to find and change all objects again.
Being able to add a group as owner would be really helpful.
We’re continuing to investigate options for adding this support. There are technical challenges to overcome in order to make this happen. We thank you for all your valuable comments so far, and welcome any additional feedback you have on what are the most important use cases involved with these scenarios.
Just need the same functionality as with AAD single sign-out: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/v2-protocols-oidc#single-sign-out
One would expect regex when it is named match.
Current options cannot be used to match our naming standard. At least more complex conditions needed, for example multiple asterisks.
But why invent something new, when there is a good and relative standard way of doing this (already supported by .net).
367 votes56 comments · Azure Active Directory » Role-based Access Control · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Just wanted to post another update that this is a high priority, but we do not have any details to announce yet.
/Stuart and Vince
111 votesunder review · 12 comments · Azure Active Directory » Developer Experiences · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Also need groups allowed as group owners.
We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.
That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.
Apologies for the delay.
We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?
We continue evaluating several alternatives to provide full email customization. We are actively working on an alternative.
Unfortunately we do no yet have an ETA.
Support for creating a container in ARM templates is now done. We have begun work to support Tables and Queues.
Here is a link to a sample template to create a container: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/resources/templates/101-storage-blob-container/
Would be nice to be able to create blob containers as part of an ARM template.
For example Event Hubs Archiving can be enabled in a template, but requires a pre-existing blob container....