sdoubleday

My feedback

  1. 292 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 249

    <=-=Oct 4 2016 2:15PM=-=>

    This is similar to my feedback located here: https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/2769130/sql-2016-temporal-tables-with-triggers. The solution I suggest is similar to this, and could be used in many different cases developing using SQL server.

    <=-=Jan 10 2017 9:43AM=-=>

    I would love this too. The issue is that many/most applications don’t use Windows Auth in the connection to SQL Server (connection pooling issues, etc), so SQL can’t get the User information

    <=-=Jan 10 2017 9:51AM=-=>

    @Sanford

    Just to clarify, I am not asking for an “automatically store user name” feature. I’m asking for “automatically store whatever I want, based on whatever expression I provide.” So the fact that the user name may or may not be available is not really relevant.

    That said, there are plenty of workarounds for various situations. I imagine that if you’re using a shared connection, you can get some notion of “user” some other…

    sdoubleday supported this idea  · 
  2. 262 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sdoubleday supported this idea  · 
  3. 370 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sdoubleday supported this idea  · 
  4. 931 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  103 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sdoubleday commented  · 

    Deployment is very painful without this.

    sdoubleday supported this idea  · 
  5. 211 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  23 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Polybase  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sdoubleday supported this idea  · 
  6. 211 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  21 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Polybase  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sdoubleday supported this idea  · 
  7. 75 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Polybase  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sdoubleday supported this idea  · 
  8. 114 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Polybase  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sdoubleday supported this idea  · 
  9. 45 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sdoubleday supported this idea  · 
    sdoubleday commented  · 

    Can we get an ETA?

  10. 55 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sdoubleday supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base