CS

My feedback

  1. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    CS supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    CS shared this idea  · 
  3. 67 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  7 comments  ·  Azure Governance » Azure Resource Graph  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    CS supported this idea  · 
  4. 124 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Availability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Apologies for the delay in updating this item. We are aware of the challenges around this limit and are actively working to be able to raise it; however, we don’t have an ETA yet.

    We will update this item as we get more clarity on the timeline. Stay tuned and thank you for the understanding.

    -Arturo Lucatero
    @ArLucaID

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    CS commented  · 

    Hi,

    Please do something about this. You are releasing more and more services leveraging RBAC, and imposing customers to change their model and create new subscriptions is a nightmare.

    For example, Azure Files requires SMB roles at RBAC level: each time we create a share, we need to burn two RBAC roles ("Storage File Data SMB Share Contributor" and "Storage File Data SMB Share Elevated Contributor") !! This plus the rest is clearly not sustainable.

    CS supported this idea  · 
  5. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Container Registry  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    CS supported this idea  · 
  6. 367 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Automation » Hybrid  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    CS supported this idea  · 
  7. 102 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  SQL Managed Instance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    With this we are announcing a limited public preview availability of LTR backup for up to 10 years for Managed Instance for EA and CSP subscriptions. There are limited number of seats available for whitelisting subscriptions and will be fulfilled on the first come – first serve basis. For customers enrolled, production support will be provided. The feature is now available through PowerShell only. Azure portal should be coming in a few months. To sign up create Azure support ticket: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-database/sql-database-long-term-retention#managed-instance-support

    We sincerely appreciate your feedback.
    Managed Instance product group

    CS supported this idea  · 
  8. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 250 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    CS supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base